Ideas.  Interesting.  Public catering.  Production.  Management.  Agriculture

How to find marginal revenue. Marginal income and its importance in making managerial decisions Marginal income is equal to

According to basic economic principles, if a company lowers the price of its products, then that company can sell more products. However, this will generate less profit for each additional item sold. Marginal revenue is the increase in revenue from the sale of an additional unit of output. Marginal revenue can be calculated using a simple formula: Marginal revenue = (change in total revenue)/(change in units sold).

Steps

Part 1

Using the Formula to Calculate Marginal Revenue

    Find the number of products sold. To calculate the marginal revenue, it is necessary to find the values ​​(exact and estimated) of several quantities. First you need to find the number of goods sold, namely one type of product in the company's product range.

    • Consider an example. A certain company sells three types of drinks: grape, orange and apple. In the 1st quarter of this year, the company sold 100 cans of grape juice, 200 of orange and 50 of apple. Find the marginal revenue for the orange drink.
    • Please note that in order to obtain the exact values ​​​​of the quantities you need (in this case, the number of goods sold), you need access to financial documents or other company records.
  1. Find the total revenue received from the sale of a particular type of product. If you know the unit price of an item sold, you can easily find the total revenue by multiplying the quantity sold by the unit price.

    Determine the unit price that must be charged in order to sell an additional unit of output. As a rule, such information is given in tasks. In real life, analysts have been trying to determine such a price for a long time and with difficulty.

    • In our example, the company lowers the price of an orange drink from $2 to $1.95. For this price, the company can sell an additional unit of orange drink, bringing the total number of items sold to 201.
  2. Find the total revenue from the sale of goods at the new (presumably lower) price. To do this, multiply the quantity of goods sold by the price per unit.

    • In our example, the total revenue from the sale of 201 cans of orange drink at $1.95 per can is: 201 x 1.95 = $391.95.
  3. Divide the change in total revenue by the change in sales to find marginal revenue. In our example, the change in quantity sold is: 201 - 200 = 1, so here, to calculate marginal revenue, simply subtract the old value of total revenue from the new value.

    • In our example, subtract the total revenue from selling the $2 item (per item) from the revenue from selling the item at $1.95 (per item): 391.95 - 400 = - $8.05.
    • Since the change in sales is 1 in our example, here you do not divide the change in total revenue by the change in sales. However, in a situation where a price cut results in the sale of several (rather than one) units of a product, you will need to divide the change in total revenue by the change in the number of products sold.

    Part 2

    Using Marginal Revenue Value
    1. Prices for products should be such as to provide the greatest revenue with an ideal ratio of price and quantity of products sold. If a change in unit price results in a negative marginal revenue, then the company incurs a loss, even if the price reduction allows an additional number of products to be sold. The company will make additional profit if it raises the price and sells fewer products.

      • In our example, marginal revenue is -$8.05. This means that by reducing the price and selling an additional unit of production, the company incurs losses. Most likely, in real life, the company will abandon plans to reduce the price.
    2. Compare marginal cost and marginal revenue to determine a company's profitability. For companies with an ideal price-to-quantity ratio, marginal revenue equals marginal cost. Following this logic, the greater the difference between total costs and total revenue, the more profitable the company.

      Companies use the value of marginal revenue to determine the quantity and price of products produced at which the company will receive the maximum revenue. Any company seeks as many products as it can sell at the best price; overproduction can lead to costs that will not pay off.

    Part 3

    Understanding Different Market Models
    1. Marginal revenue under perfect competition. In the examples above, a simplified model of the market was considered, when there is only one company in it. In real life, things are different. A company that controls the entire market for a certain type of product is called a monopoly. But in most cases, any company has competitors, which affects its pricing; In a perfectly competitive market, firms tend to charge the lowest prices. In this case, the marginal revenue, as a rule, does not change with the change in the number of products sold, since the price, which is minimal, cannot be reduced.

      • In our example, suppose that the company in question competes with hundreds of other companies. As a result, the price per can of drink dropped to $0.50 (lowering the price would result in a loss, while raising the price would result in lower sales and the closure of the company). In this case, the number of cans sold does not depend on the price (because it is constant), so the marginal revenue will always be $0.50.
    2. Marginal revenue under monopolistic competition. In real life, small competing firms do not immediately react to price changes, they do not have complete information about their competitors, and they do not always set prices for maximum profit. This market model is called monopolistic competition; many small firms compete with each other, and since they are not "perfect" competitors, their marginal revenue may decrease as they sell an additional unit of output.

      • In our example, suppose that the company in question operates under monopolistic competition. If most drinks sell for $1 (per can), then the company in question can sell a can of drink for $0.85. Assume that the company's competitors are unaware of the price cut or cannot respond to it. Similarly, consumers may not be aware of a drink at a lower price and continue to buy $1 drinks. In this case, marginal revenue tends to decrease because sales are only partially driven by price (they are also driven by the behavior of consumers and competing firms).

Revenue is zero when the price is $6 because nothing is sold at that price. However, at a price of $5, 1 unit is sold and revenue is $5. An increase in sales from 1 to 2 units increases revenue from $5 to $8, so marginal revenue is $3. When

Algebraically, if the demand for a product is P = 6-Q, then the total income received by the firm is PQ = 6Q - Q2. The average income is PQ/Q =6 - Q, which is the demand curve for the product. Marginal revenue is DR(Q)/AQ, or 6-2Q. This can be verified from the data in Table. 8.1.

When an individual firm encounters a demand expressed as a horizontal line on a graph, as in Fig. 8.2a, then she can sell an additional unit of production without reducing the price. As a result, total income increases by an amount equal to the price (one bushel of wheat sold for $4 gives an additional income of $4, i.e. MR = AR(q)/Aq = A(4q)/ Aq = 4 ). At the same time, the average income received by the firm is also $4, since each bushel of wheat produced will be sold for $4 (AR = Pq/q = P == $4). Therefore, the demand curve for an individual firm in a competitive market is expressed by both average and marginal revenue curves.

Rice. 8.3 shows this graphically. On fig. Figure 8.3a shows the firm's income R(q) as a straight line through the origin. Its slope is the ratio of the change in income to the change in the volume of output, i.e., equal to the marginal income. Similarly, the slope of the line of total costs (TC) is the ratio of changes in production costs to changes in output, i.e., marginal costs.

This condition also follows from the data in Table. 8.2. For all outputs up to 8, marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost. For any output of up to 8 units, the firm should increase output, as profits increase. At an output of 9 units, however, marginal cost becomes higher than marginal revenue, and so the additional output will reduce rather than increase profits. In table. 8.2 does not show the volume of output at which marginal revenue exactly coincides with marginal cost. At the same time, it follows from the given data that when MR(q) > M (q), the volume of output must be increased, and when MR(q)

The expression AR(q)/Aq is the ratio of the change in income to the change in output, or marginal revenue, and AT (q)/Aq is the marginal cost. Thus, we conclude that the profit reaches its maximum when

Curves of marginal income and marginal costs in fig. 8.4 also illustrate this profit maximization rule. The average and marginal revenue curves are drawn as horizontal lines at a price of $40. In this figure, we have drawn an average cost curve AC, an average variable cost curve AV, and a marginal cost curve MC to better show the firm's profits.

Profit reaches its maximum at point A, associated with output q = 8 and a price of $40, since at this point marginal revenue equals marginal cost. At lower output (say, q, = 7), marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost, and therefore profits can be further increased by increasing output. The shaded area between qi = 7 and q shows the lost profit associated with production at qi. At higher output (say, qs), marginal cost is higher than marginal revenue. In this case, the reduction in output yields cost savings that exceed marginal revenue. The shaded area between q and q2 == 9 shows the lost profit associated with production at q2.

The application of the rule that marginal revenue must equal marginal cost depends on the manager's ability to estimate marginal cost. To correctly estimate costs, managers should remember three main points.

A careful study of Fig. Figure 8.18 shows that an output tax can have a twofold effect. First, if the tax is less than the firm's marginal revenue, it will maximize its profits by choosing the output at which its marginal cost plus tax equals the price of output. The firm's output falls from qi to q2, and the indirect effect of the tax is to shift the short-run supply curve upward (by the amount of the tax). Secondly, if the tax hurts

But AR/AQ is marginal revenue and A /AQ is marginal cost, and so the condition for profit maximization is

Rice. 10.2b shows the corresponding average and marginal revenue curves, as well as average and marginal cost curves. The marginal revenue and marginal cost curves intersect at Q =10. Given the volume of production, the average cost is $15 per unit, the price is $30 per unit, and therefore the average profit is $30 - $15 = $15 per unit. Since 10 units are sold, the profit is $10-$15-$150 (the area of ​​the shaded rectangle).

To do this, we must rewrite the marginal revenue formula as follows

Now, since the goal of the firm is profit maximization, we can equate marginal revenue with marginal cost

On the graph, we shift the marginal cost curve up by t and find a new intersection point with the marginal revenue curve (Fig. 10.4). Here Qo and Rho are, respectively, the volume of production and the price before taxation, and Qi and PI are the volume of output and the price after the introduction of the tax.

We can answer this question by comparing consumer and producer surpluses in competitive and monopolized markets (we assume that producers in a competitive market and a monopolist have the same cost curves). Rice. 10.7 shows the average and marginal revenue curves and the monopolist's marginal cost curve. To maximize profits, the firm produces the output at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost. The monopoly price and output are denoted as Pm and Qm. In a competitive market, price must equal marginal cost, and the competitive price Pc and quantity Q must be at the intersection of the average income curve (coinciding with the demand curve) and the marginal cost curve. Now let's see how it changes

Marginal revenue curve. When the regulated price should not be higher than P,

The firm's new marginal revenue curve corresponds to its new average revenue curve, and it is shown as a thick line. For outputs up to Qi, marginal revenue is equal to average revenue. For outputs greater than Qi, the new marginal revenue curve is the same as the old one. The firm will produce Qi because it is at this point that the marginal revenue curve crosses the marginal cost curve. You can check that at price PI and quantity Qi, the total net loss from monopoly power is reduced.

First, we need to determine the profit the firm earns when it charges a single price P (Figure 11.2). To figure this out, we can add the profit from each additional unit produced and sold to the total output Q. This extra profit is the marginal revenue minus the marginal cost for each unit of output. On fig. 11.2 this marginal revenue for the first unit is the highest, and the marginal cost is the lowest. For each additional unit, marginal revenue decreases and marginal cost increases. Therefore, the firm produces a total output Q at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost. Producing any quantity greater than Q would raise marginal cost above marginal revenue and thus lower profits. The total profit is the sum of the profit from each sold unit of output and, therefore, is represented by the shaded area in Fig. 11.2 between the curves of marginal income and marginal

What happens if the firm engages in ideal price diversification Since each customer is assigned exactly the price he is willing to pay, the marginal revenue curve is no longer related to the firm's output decision. Instead, the extra income from each additional unit sold is

Rice. 7.4. Demand and marginal revenue of a monopolist

conclusion: in conditions of perfect competition, marginal revenue is equal to the price of the goods, i.e. MR - R.

What will be MR with imperfect competition?

Let's graphically (see Fig. 7.4) the dynamics of marginal income and demand in conditions of imperfect competition (on the y-axis - marginal income and price, on the abscissa - the amount of production).

From the graph in Fig. 7.4 shows that MR Decreases faster than demand D. AT mustache lovia not With over w ennoy conch at rents ai marginal revenue m day w e prices(MR After all, in order to sell an additional unit of output, an imperfect competitor lowers the price. This decrease gives him some gain (table. 7.2 shows that gross income increases), but at the same time brings some losses. What are these losses? The fact is that, having sold, for example, the 3rd unit for $37, the manufacturer thereby reduced the price of each of the previous units of production(and each one sold for $39). Therefore, now all buyers pay a lower price. The loss on previous units would be $4 ($2 x 2). This loss is subtracted from the price of $37, resulting in a marginal revenue of $33.

The relationship of fig. 7.3 and 7.4 is as follows: after gross income reaches its maximum, marginal income becomes negative. This pattern will help us later to understand at what part of the demand curve the monopolist sets a profit-maximizing price. Note also that in the case of a linear demand curve D, the schedule MR crosses the x-axis exactly in the middle of the distance between zero and the demand at zero price.

Let us return to the costs of the firm. We know that the average cost (AU) have at first, when the number of units of production is increased

Chapter 7

appears to be a decreasing trend. Later, however, when a certain level of output is reached and exceeded, average costs begin to rise. The dynamics of average costs, as we know, has the form (L-shaped curve (see Chapter 6, § 1). Let us depict the dynamics of the average, total (gross) and marginal costs of an imperfect competitor firm on an abstract digital example. But first, we recall once again the following designations:

TC=QxAC,(1)

i.e., gross costs are equal to the product of the quantity of goods and average costs;

MS= TS p - TS pA, (2)

i.e., marginal cost is equal to the difference between the gross cost of n units of the good and the gross cost of n-1 units of the good;

TR=QxP,(3)

i.e., gross income is equal to the product of the quantity of goods and its price;

MR= TR n - TR n .,, (4)



i.e. marginal revenue is equal to the difference between the gross revenue from the sale of n units of the product and the gross revenue from the sale of n-1 units of the product.

Columns 2, 3, 4 (Table 7.3) characterize the production conditions of the monopoly firm, and columns 5, 6, 7 - the conditions of sale.

Let us once again return to the concept of perfect competition and the equilibrium of the firm in these conditions. As you know, equilibrium occurs when MS\u003d P, and the price in conditions of perfect competition coincides with marginal revenue, therefore, we can write: MS = MR = R. For a firm to achieve full equilibrium, two conditions must be met:

1. Marginal revenue must equal marginal cost;

2. Price must equal average cost. 1 And this means:

MC=MR=P=AC 5)

The behavior of a monopoly firm in the market

sheet will be exactly the same determined

dynamics of marginal revenue (MR) and

marginal cost (MC). Why ? By-

because each additional

unit, product price adds

some amount to gross income

and at the same time -


Table 7.3 Col and ches t in t ovarov, in and dy costs, price and in and types of income

Q AC TS MS R TR MR
Number of units produced Average cost Gross costs marginal cost Price Gross income marginal revenue
21,75 43,5 19,5
19,75 59,25 15,75
12,75
16,5 82,5 10,5
15,25 91,5
14,25 99,75 8,25
13,5 8,25
12,75 127,5 10,5
12,75 140,25 12,75
16,25 -3
13,5 175,5 19,5 -7
14,25 199,5 -11
15,25 228,25 29,25 -15
16,5 36,75 -19
-23

to gross costs. These are some quantities marginal revenue and marginal costs. The firm must constantly compare these two values. While the difference between MR and MS positive, the firm is expanding its production. You can draw the following analogy: as the potential difference provides the movement of electric current, so the positive difference MR and MS allows the firm to expand its output. When MR= MS, comes "peace", the equilibrium of the firm. But what price will be established in this case under "conditions of imperfect con-


Chapter 7


Market mechanism of imperfect competition

smoking? What will be the average cost (AS)"? Will the formula be followed? MS - MR = P = AC?

Let's turn to Table. 7.3. The monopolist, of course, seeks to set high unit prices. However, if he sets the price at $41, he will sell only one unit of the product, and his gross income will be only $41, and profit (41 - 24) = $17. Etc ib eul - e t about different and ca m every at gross m income m and gross mi and delay mi . Suppose that the monopolist gradually lowers the price and sets it at $35. Then he can sell, of course, more than 1 unit of the product, for example, 4 units, but this is also an insignificant amount of sales. At the same time, his gross income will be equal to $140 (35 x 4), and profit (140 - 72) = $68. Following the demand curve, the monopolist, by lowering the price, can increase sales. For example, at a price of $33, he will sell 5 units already. And although the profit per unit of goods will decrease, the total amount of profit will increase. To what extent will the monopolist lower the price in an effort to increase his profit? Obviously, up to the point where marginal revenue (MR) will be equal to the marginal cost (MS) in this case, when selling 9 units of goods.

It is in this case that the amount of profit will be maximum, i.e. (225 - 117) = $ 108. If the seller lowers the price further, for example, to $ 23, then the result will be as follows: having sold 10 units of the product, the monopolist would receive marginal income 5 dollars, and the marginal cost would be 10.5 dollars. Therefore, the sale of 10 units of goods at a price of 23 dollars would lead to a decrease in the profit of the monopolist (230 - 127.5) = 102.5.

Let's return to fig. 7.3. We do not determine the maximum profit margin “by eye”, estimating at what volume of sales the difference between gross income and gross costs is maximum. Marginal revenue and marginal cost determine the slope of the gross revenue and gross cost curves at any point. Let's draw tangents to points L and B. Their equal slope means that MR= MS. It is in this case that the profit of the monopoly will be maximum.

Under conditions of imperfect competition, the equilibrium of the firm (i.e., the equality of marginal cost and marginal revenue, or MS= MR) achieved at such a volume of production, when average costs do not reach their minimum. The price is above the average cost. Perfect competition is equal MS= MR = P-AC. With imperfect competition

(MS = MR)< АС < R(6)

A profit maximizing monopolist always operates on the elastic part of the demand curve, since only when


Rice. 7.5. Monopoly equilibriumin short term

elasticity coefficient greater than one (E D P > 1), marginal revenue is positive. On the elastic part of the demand curve, a price decrease provides the monopolist with an increase in gross income. Let us turn again to the relationship in Fig. 7.3 and 7.4. At E D P=1, marginal revenue is zero, and at E 0 R< 1, marginal revenue becomes negative (see Chapter 5, § 8).

So, the maximum profit can be determined by comparing TR and TS at different volumes of output; the same result will be obtained when compared MR and MS. In other words, the maximum difference between TR and TS(maximum profit) will be observed when the equality MR and MS. Both methods of determining the maximum profit are equivalent and give the same result.

On fig. 7.5 it can be seen that the equilibrium position of the firm is determined by the point £ (the point of intersection MS and MR), from which we draw a vertical to the demand curve D. Thus, we find out the price that provides the greatest profit. This price will be set at E g The shaded rectangle shows the amount of monopoly profit.

Under perfect competition, the firm expands its production without lowering the selling price. Production increases up to the moment of equality MS and mr. The monopolist is guided by the same rule - he compares additional costs and additional income, making a decision to expand, suspend or reduce production, that is, he compares his MS and mr. And he expands production until the moment of equality MS and mr. But the volume of production in this case will be less than it would be under perfect competition, i.e. Q,< Q 2 . При совершенной конкуренции именно in point E 2 marginal cost coincides. (MS) minimum

Chapter 7


Market mechanism of imperfect competition

value of average costs (AU) and selling price level (R). If the price (R 2) set at the point E 2, there would be no monopoly profit.

Price setting by the firm at the point level E 2 would obviously be altruism. At this point MS = AC= R. But at the same time MS > MR. A rationally operating firm will by no means consider it normal that the expansion of production in the name of "public interests" will be accompanied by more additional costs for it than additional income.

Society is interested in a larger volume of production and lower costs per unit of output. With an increase in output from O to Q 2, average costs would decrease, but then, in order to sell additional products, one would either have to lower the price or increase sales promotion costs (and this is due to an increase in marketing costs). This path is not suitable for an imperfect competitor: he does not want to "spoil" his market by lowering prices. To maximize profits, the firm creates a certain deficit, which causes a price that exceeds marginal cost. Scarcity means a limitation (smaller supply) in conditions of imperfect competition compared to its volume, which would be in conditions of perfect competition. This is clear from the graph: in Fig. 7.5 shows that O,< Q 2 .

Monopoly profit in the imperfect competition model is treated as a surplus over normal profit. Monopoly profit is manifested as a result of violation of the conditions of perfect competition, as a manifestation of the monopoly factor in the market.

But how sustainable is this excess over normal profit? Obviously, much will depend on the possibilities for the influx of new firms into the industry. Under perfect competition, higher than normal profits disappear relatively quickly under the influence of an influx of new firms. E With l and same b arriere for entry and I'm in the industry before With exactly you With OK and , t about monopoly pr and true story b re t ae t at st ouch and your character t ep. In the long run, any monopoly is open, so in the long run there is a tendency for monopoly profits to disappear as new producers enter the industry. Graphically, this means that the average cost curve AC will only touch the demand curve. Something similar happens in a market structure called monopolistic competition (see Figure 7.14 below).

To measure the degree of monopoly power in economic theory is used and Lerner index(named after Abba Lerner, an English economist who proposed this indicator in the 30s of the XX century):

L= P-MC_


The greater the gap between P and MC, the greater the degree of monopoly power. Value L is between 0 and 1. Under perfect competition, when P = MS, The Lerner index will naturally be 0.

Perfect competition implies the free flow of all factors of production from industry to industry. Therefore, under conditions of perfect competition, as emphasized by the neoclassical school, there is a clear trend towards zero profit. 1 If there are obstacles to the free flow of resources, there is a monopoly profit.

Considering the marginal income of a monopoly, we said that a decrease in the price of each subsequent unit of goods means a decrease in the price of previous units of production of the monopoly firm. Can an imperfect competitor do the following: sell the first unit of a product at a price of $41, the second at a price of $39, the third at a price of $37, and so on? Then the monopolist would sell each buyer the product at the maximum price he is willing to pay.

So we came to the practice of pricing, which is called price d is Cree mi national and her: selling one and t wow t ovara are different m on t re bit spruce m or gr at ppa m on t re bit firs in different ways m price m , etc and Che m decomp and h and I'm not talking about prices boo caught decomp and h and pits and in and costs for and factory st va. The word "discrimination" here does not mean the infringement of someone's rights, but "separation".

The purpose of the price discrimination policy is to monopolist's desire to appropriate consumer surplus and thereby maximize your profits. Depending on the extent to which he succeeds, price discrimination is divided into three types: discrimination of the first, second and third degree. Let's consider each of these types in detail.

At price discrimination first st epen, or with over w ennoi
price
discrimination, the monopolist sells each unit of the good
to each buyer according to his reserve and fixed price, i.e. that maxi
the lowest price a consumer is willing to pay for a given item
the bottom of the goods. This means that all of
the consumer’s necks are assigned a monopo-

sheet, and the marginal revenue curve

falls off the demand curve for its product

Qiyu (see Figure 7.6). .


Chapter 7


Market mechanism of imperfect competition


Assume that marginal cost is constant. In first-degree price discrimination, the monopolist sells the first unit of good 0 1 at its reserved price. RU the same applies to the second one (sold by Q 2 at a price R 2), and subsequent units. In other words, the maximum of what he is willing to pay is "squeezed" out of each buyer. Then the curve MR coincides with the demand curve D, and the profit-maximizing sales volume corresponds to the point Q n , since it is at the point £ that the marginal cost curve (MS) intersects with the demand curve D(MR) discriminatory monopolist.

Therefore, the marginal revenue from the sale of an additional unit of output in each case will be equal to its price, as in conditions of perfect competition. As a result, the monopolist's profit will increase by an amount equal to consumer surplus (shaded area).

) Third degree price discrimination

However, such a pricing policy is very rare in practice, since for its implementation, the monopolist must have amazing insight and know exactly what is the maximum price that each buyer is willing to pay for each unit of this product. We can say that perfect price discrimination is the ideal, the "blue dream" of the monopolist. Like any "blue dream", it is extremely rarely achieved. For example, a well-known lawyer, knowing well the solvency of his clientele, can charge each such price for his services, which corresponds to the maximum amount that the client is willing to pay.

Price d is Cree mi national and I am second st epen and is a pricing policy, the essence of which is to set different prices depending on the quantity of purchased products. When buying more goods, the consumer is charged a lower price for each copy of the goods. Another example: in Moscow there are various tariffs


fa for travel on the subway, depending on the number of trips. We can say that the subway implements a policy of price discrimination of the second degree. Very often, second-degree price discrimination takes the form of various price discounts (discounts).

Price d is kr them national and I t re t ey st epen A situation in which a monopolist sells goods to different groups of buyers with different price elasticity of demand. What is happening here is not a division of demand prices into individual copies or volumes of goods, but market segmentation, that is, the division of buyers into groups depending on their purchasing power. The monopolist creates, to put it simply, "expensive" and "cheap" markets.

In the "expensive" market, demand is low elastic, which allows the monopoly to increase revenue by raising prices, and in the "cheap" market it is highly elastic, which makes it possible to increase total revenue by selling more products at lower prices (see Figure 7.7) . The most difficult problem of third-degree price discrimination is to reliably separate one market from another, i.e. "expensive" from "cheap". If this is not done, then the idea of ​​profit maximization will not be realized. After all, consumers in the "cheap" market will buy products at low prices and resell them in the "expensive" market. Let us give a specific example of a fairly reliable division of the market: in a museum of fine arts, tickets for schoolchildren and students are always cheaper than for adult buyers. The museum administration sells cheap tickets only upon presentation of an appropriate certificate, and visually verifying the age of the buyer. Imagine a situation where enterprising schoolchildren would buy lots of cheap tickets and then resell them at the entrance to adult visitors at prices lower than those set by the museum for

Rice. 7.7.

Chapter 7


Market mechanism of imperfect competition

adults is impossible. After all, even if an elderly art lover uses the services of a young businessman, at the control entrance he will have to present not only a cheap ticket, but also his blooming youthful appearance.

A clear example of third-degree price discrimination can be seen in the famous novel by I. Ilf and E. Petrov “The Twelve Chairs”, when Ostap Bender was selling tickets overlooking the “Proval”: “Get tickets, citizens! Ten cents! Children and Red Army soldiers for free. Students five kopecks! Non-union members - thirty kopecks!” Third-degree price discrimination is also carried out when setting different prices for hotel services to foreign and domestic visitors, different prices for dishes in a restaurant during the day and in the evening, etc.

Let us explain the idea of ​​price discrimination of the third degree graphically. On fig. 7.7 the markets on which the discriminating monopolist operates are shown: cases and and b. Let's assume that the marginal cost MS are the same when selling products at different prices. Curve intersection MS and MR determines the price level. Since the price elasticity in the "expensive" and "cheap" markets is different, their prices will also be different as a result of price discrimination. In the "expensive" market, the monopolist will set the price P, and the volume of sales will be Q,. In the "cheap" market, the price will be at the level R 2 and sales volume Q 2 . Gross income in all cases is shown as shaded boxes. The sum of the areas of the rectangles in cases a) and b) will be higher than the area denoting the gross income of a monopolist that does not conduct price discrimination (case c).

Thus, a discriminating monopolist must be able to reliably divide its market, focusing on different price elasticity of demand for different consumers.

Conditions for profit maximization under perfect competition.

ANSWER

According to the traditional theory of the firm and the theory of markets, profit maximization is the main goal of the firm. Therefore, the firm must choose such a volume of supplied products in order to achieve maximum profit for each period of sales.

PROFIT is the difference between gross (total) income (TR) and total (gross, total) production costs (TC) for the sales period:

profit = TR - TS.

Gross income- this is the price (P) of the goods sold, multiplied by the volume of sales (Q).

Since the price is not affected by a competitive firm, it can affect its income only by changing the volume of sales. If the firm's gross income is greater than its total costs, then it makes a profit. If the total cost exceeds the gross income, then the firm incurs losses.

total costs is the cost of all factors of production used by the firm in the production of a given volume of output.

Maximum Profit achieved in two cases:

a) when the gross income (TR) exceeds the total costs (TC) to the greatest extent;

b) when marginal revenue (MR) is equal to marginal cost (MC).

Marginal Revenue (MR) is the change in gross income resulting from the sale of an additional unit of output. For a competitive firm, marginal revenue is always equal to the price of the product:

The marginal profit maximization is the difference between the marginal revenue from the sale of an additional unit of output and the marginal cost:

marginal profit = MR - MC.

marginal cost Additional costs that increase output by one unit of the good. Marginal cost is entirely variables costs because fixed costs do not change with output. For a competitive firm, marginal cost is equal to the market price of the good:

The marginal condition for profit maximization is the level of output at which price equals marginal cost.

Having determined the profit maximization limit of the firm, it is necessary to establish an equilibrium output that maximizes profit.

The most profitable equilibrium This is the position of the firm in which the volume of goods offered is determined by the equality of the market price to marginal cost and marginal revenue:

The most profitable equilibrium under perfect competition is illustrated in Fig. 26.1.

Rice. 26.1. Equilibrium output of a competitive firm

The firm chooses the volume of output that allows it to extract the maximum profit. At the same time, it should be borne in mind that the output that provides the maximum profit does not mean at all that the largest profit is extracted per unit of this product. It follows that it is wrong to use unit profit as a measure of total profit.

In determining the level of output that maximizes profit, it is necessary to compare market prices with average costs.

Average cost (AC)- costs per unit of output; equal to the total cost of producing a given quantity of output divided by the quantity of output produced. Distinguish three type of average costs: average gross (total) costs (AC); average fixed costs (AFC); average variable costs (AVC).

The ratio of market price and average production costs can have several options:

The price is greater than the average cost of production, maximizing profit. In this case, the firm extracts economic profit, i.e., its income exceeds all its costs (Fig. 26.2);

Rice. 26.2. Profit maximization by a competitive firm

The price is equal to the minimum average production costs, which provides the company with self-sufficiency, i.e., the company only covers its costs, which makes it possible for it to receive a normal profit (Fig. 26.3);

Rice. 26.3. Self-sustaining competitive firm

The price is below the minimum possible average cost, that is, the firm does not cover all its costs and incurs losses (Fig. 26.4);

The price falls below the minimum average cost, but exceeds the average minimum variables costs, i.e. the firm is able to minimize its losses (Fig. 26.5); price below average low variables costs, which means the cessation of production, because the company's losses exceed fixed costs (Fig. 26.6).

Rice. 26.4. Competitive firm incurring losses

Rice. 26.5. Minimizing the losses of a competitive firm

Rice. 26.6. Termination of production by a competitive firm

This text is an introductory piece. From the book Common Mistakes in Accounting and Reporting author Utkina Svetlana Anatolievna

Example 19. The cost of extra pay for night work is taken into account for income tax purposes in the absence of this condition in the employment contract with an employee

From the book Economic Theory author

Question 53 Concepts of profit

From the book The Undercover Economist author Harford Tim

CHAPTER 3 Perfectly Competitive Markets and the "True World" IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE THAT THE FILMS WITH JIM CARRY AND ECONOMIC SCIENCE HAVE ANYTHING IN COMMON, BUT IT APPEARS WE HAVE A LOT TO LEARN FROM THIS GUTTA-PERCH MASKED COMEDIAN. Take the film Liar Liar, which tells

From the book Microeconomics author Vechkanova Galina Rostislavovna

Question 28 Profit maximization conditions under monopoly. ANSWER The behavior of a monopoly firm is determined not only by consumer demand and marginal revenue, but also by production costs. The monopoly firm will increase output to such a volume when

From the book Microeconomics author Vechkanova Galina Rostislavovna

Question 58 The concept of profit. ANSWER: Different concepts of production costs give rise to different concepts of profit. Allocate accounting, economic and normal profit. Accounting profit is the difference between the total proceeds from the sale of products (works,

author

10.2. Offer and price in conditions of perfect competition 10.2.1. Market Demand and Demand for a Firm's Product under Perfect Competition Under perfect competition, a firm is so small compared to the market as a whole system that the decisions it makes

From the book Economic Theory: Textbook author Makhovikova Galina Afanasievna

10.2.1. Market Demand and Demand for the Firm's Product under Perfect Competition Under perfect competition, the firm is so small compared to the market as a whole that its decisions have little or no effect on the market price. Established under

From the book Economic Theory: Textbook author Makhovikova Galina Afanasievna

10.2.2. Profit maximization condition under perfect competition Profit maximization is one of the main goals of any firm. Profit is the difference between total revenue (TR) and total cost (TC) of a firm to produce a good or service. Therefore, in order to

From the book Economic Theory: Textbook author Makhovikova Galina Afanasievna

Lesson 7 Pricing in conditions of perfect competition Seminar Educational laboratory: we answer, discuss and discuss ... We answer: 1. It is believed that perfect competition is an extreme case of market structure. If so, why is it important to understand actions

From the book Microeconomics: lecture notes author Tyurina Anna

LECTURE № 9

From the book Sociology of Labor author Gorshkov Alexander

10. Factors affecting the behavior of economic agents in the labor market: wages, prices, profits and working conditions In a market economy, wages are formed under the influence of the labor market. The object of sale and purchase in such markets is labor. Paying a person for

From the book Conscious Capitalism. Companies that benefit customers, employees and society author Sisodia Rajendra

The myth of income maximization The very common myth that the ultimate goal of business is always to maximize the income of investors, in all likelihood, originates in the work of economists at the beginning of the industrial revolution. How did he appear? Obviously the reason

author

Question 46 Analysis of the formation of retained earnings It is advisable to start the analysis of retained earnings by studying its composition and the dynamics of changes in individual items. The composition of retained earnings should include the following items of form No. 2 “Report on

From the book Economic Analysis author Klimova Natalia Vladimirovna

Question 47 Methods of factor analysis of profit from sales Analysis of profit from sales is carried out in three directions: for each type of product, for product groups and for the organization as a whole. The profit from the sale of a particular type of product is influenced by sales volume, price

From the book Economic Analysis author Klimova Natalia Vladimirovna

Question 50 Analysis of the use of net profit Control over the distribution of profits in practice is carried out through the submission of appropriate reports. However, the reporting calendar year is part of the overall development period

From the book Economic Analysis author Klimova Natalia Vladimirovna

Question 52 Methodology for calculating reserves for profit growth and increasing profitability Reserves for increasing profitability indicators are reserves for profit growth. A method for calculating reserves for increasing profits due to: increasing sales of profitable products.

Since the monopolist is the only producer of a given good, the demand curve for the monopolist's product is at the same time the market demand curve for the good. This curve has, as usual, a negative slope (Fig. 11.16). Therefore, the monopolist can control the price of his product, but then he will have to face a change in the magnitude of demand: the higher the price, the lower the demand. Monopoly is a price finder. Its goal is to set a price (respectively, choose such an issue) at which its profit will be maximum.

The general rule is that profit is maximized at the output when marginal revenue equals marginal cost - MR = MS(topic 10, paragraph 10.3) - remains true for a monopoly. The only difference is that for a perfectly competitive firm, the marginal revenue line (MR) is horizontal and coincides with the market price line at which this firm can sell any quantity of its products (topic 10, paragraph 10.2). In other words, the marginal revenue of a competitive firm is equal to price. On the contrary, for the monopoly line MR is not horizontal and does not coincide with the price line (demand curve).

To justify this, remember that marginal revenue is the increment in revenue when output is increased by one unit:

For an example of calculating marginal revenue, take

the simplest demand function for a monopoly product: P= 10 - q. Let's make a table (Table 11.1).

Table 11.1. Marginal revenue of a monopolist

TR (P X q)

MR (ATR/Aq)

9 7 5 3 1 -1 -3 -5 -7 -9

It follows from the data in the table that if the monopolist reduces the price from 10 to 9, demand increases from 0 to 1. Accordingly, revenue increases by 9. This is the marginal revenue received from the release of an additional unit of output. An increase in output by one more unit leads to an increase in revenue by another 7, and so on. In the table, the values ​​of marginal revenue are located not strictly under the values ​​of price and demand, but between them. In this case, the output increments are not infinitesimal, and therefore the marginal revenue is obtained, as it were, “on the transition” from one production quantity to another.

At the moment when marginal revenue reaches zero (the last unit of output does not increase revenue at all), the revenue of the monopoly reaches a maximum. A further increase in production leads to a drop in revenue, i.e. marginal revenue becomes negative.

The data in the table allow us to conclude that the value of marginal revenue related to each output value (except zero) is less than the corresponding price value. The fact is that when an additional unit of output is produced, revenue increases by the price of this unit of output ( R). At the same time to sell this extra unit

output, it is necessary to reduce the price by the value But according to the new

price, not only the last, but also all previous units of the issue are sold (q), previously sold at a higher price. Therefore, the monopolist suffers a loss in revenue from the price reduction,

equal . Subtracting from the gain from output growth the loss from

price reduction, we obtain the value of marginal revenue, which is, therefore, less than the new price:

With infinitesimal changes in price and demand, the formula takes the form:

where is the derivative of the price function with respect to demand.

Let's return to the table. Let the monopolist set a price of 7 last week by selling 3 units at it. goods. In an attempt to increase revenue, he lowers the price to 6 this week, allowing him to sell 4 units. goods. Hence, from the expansion of output by one unit, the monopolist receives 6 units. additional income. But from the sale of the first 3 units. of goods, he now receives only 18 units. revenue instead of 21 units. last week. The losses of the monopolist from the price reduction are, therefore, 3. Therefore, the marginal income from the expansion of sales with the price reduction is: 6 - 3 = 3 (see Table 11.1).

It can be rigorously proven that with a linear demand function for the monopolist's product, the function of its marginal revenue is also linear, and its slope is twice the slope of the demand curve(Fig. 11.3).

If the demand function is given analytically: R = P(q), then to determine the marginal revenue function, it is easiest to first calculate

Rice. 11.3.

maintain the output revenue function: TR = P(q)xq, and then take its output derivative:

Let's combine the functions of demand, marginal revenue (MR) marginal (MS) and average costs (AU) monopolist in one figure (Fig. 11.4).


Rice. 11.4.

Point of intersection of curves MR and MS defines release (q m), at which the monopolist earns the maximum profit. Marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost. On the demand curve, we find the monopoly price corresponding to this output (P t). At this price (output) the monopoly is in a state of equilibrium for it is unprofitable for her to raise or lower the price.

In this case, at the equilibrium point, the monopolist receives economic profit (surplus profit). It is equal to the difference between its revenue and total costs:

On fig. 11.4 revenue is the area of ​​the rectangle OP m Eq m , total cost - area of ​​rectangle OCFq m . Therefore, the profit is equal to the area of ​​the rectangle CP m EF.

It is noteworthy that in conditions of monopoly equilibrium, the price is higher than marginal cost. This is different from the equilibrium of a competitive firm: such a firm chooses an output at which price exactly equals marginal cost. The problems arising from this will be discussed below.

In the topic “Perfect competition” (item 4), it was said that in the long run a competitive firm is not able to earn economic profit. This is not the case in a monopoly. As soon as the monopolist manages to protect its market from the invasion of competitors, it maintains economic profit in the long run.

At the same time, the possession of monopoly power does not in itself guarantee economic profit, even in the short run. A monopolist can incur losses if the demand for its products falls or its costs increase - for example, due to an increase in resource prices or taxes (Fig. 11.5).


Rice. 11.5.

In the figure, the monopoly's average total cost curve is above the demand curve for any output, which condemns the monopoly to losses. By choosing an output at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost, the monopolist minimizes its losses in the short run. The total loss in this case is equal to the area CFEPm. In the long run, the monopolist may try to lower its costs by changing the amount of capital employed. In case of failure, he will have to leave the industry.

Loading...
artlifebazar.ru - Ideas. Interesting. Public catering. Production. Management. Agriculture