How does the competition for the selection of a management company take place: the procedure and rules for choosing under the current Housing Code. Campaigning for the creation of an HOA: the ideology of the owner What are the violations

Initially, the issue of managing homeownership is handled by the developer.

He receives permission to put the house into operation, then within 5 days from that moment he, at his own discretion, chooses the Criminal Code, with which for 3 months.

At the same time, the local self-government, within 20 days from the moment the MKD is put into operation, notifies that the house is put up for an open tender for the selection of the management company. Within 40 days from the notification of the event, the local government must hold this competition and inform all equity holders about its results within 10 days from the date of its completion.

Management activities are assigned to or by the local government of the company, since not all apartments are occupied and there are few owners to vote for the Criminal Code.

Grounds for the competition

The first basis for holding an elective competition is the delivery of an apartment building for direct use or operation.

When the construction phase is completed, and the owners have received their documents and long-awaited keys, a certain period is allotted by law for the tenants to choose a method of management.

The second reason arises as a result of non-fulfillment of the will of the legislator. If within the allotted period of one month, the tenants still do not choose the method of management, the local administration takes this issue under control and helps the tenants decide on the method of management.

If the owners have refused the services of one management company, they will need a new organization serving common house property. Thus, a change in the organization for managing an apartment building can also be considered a basis.

Reference! The law provides for situations when she herself breaks the contract. In this situation, it is also necessary to choose a new management company for the apartment building.

Competition rules

Regulatory acts

If representatives of the local self-government body are present at the meeting and competition, then a large role in the regulation of the event is given to local regulations. Each municipality has its own, but does not contradict the basic law.

To get acquainted with the acts of your municipality, you should go to the website of the city administration.

In addition, when holding a competition, it is important to be guided by the articles of the Housing Code, as he says. The rules for holding a tender for the selection of a management company, adopted by Government Decree No. 75 of February 6, 2006, are the main source, in accordance with which the whole procedure takes place. Read in advance all the nuances prescribed in this act.

In recent years, the legislative system of our country has been reformed more and more often, and the Housing Code has not bypassed innovations. Some articles more fully reveal themselves in Federal Law No. 38 of April 5, 2013. The act refers to the changes that have been made to the Housing Code, and also provides some comments on the articles.

Members

The participants of the competition are, on the one hand, the electors, that is, the residents of the house and the local self-government body (SRO), and on the other hand, the applicant or applicants for the mandatory management of the entire house.

The number of applicants is not limited, the main thing is to familiarize tenants with their participation in the auction in advance.

Competition subject

The subject of the competition is the right to manage the house and common house property, which will be expressed in the conclusion of an agreement between the parties for a limited or unlimited period.

Also, the subject can be attributed to the funds that the management company will manage, providing reporting to residents.

subject of bargaining

The subject of the auction is payment for the activities of the management company, as well as its ability to manage property. So, if one management company has valued its services and work at a certain amount, another may lower the bar and thus be more interesting to the owners.

Reference: during the auction, the management companies acquaint the owners with the results of their work in other areas, talk about possible prospects for cooperation and a program of action for the first time.

How is the winner determined?

If the initiators of the competition are the owners of an apartment building, then the winner is determined by voting.

The competition may be:

In both cases, the results obtained are summarized and a management company is appointed. But there is one "but".

If the sum of votes cast for the winner still does not reach the mark of fifty percent, the company that received the most votes does not pass the competition. Unanimity of owners required, which manifests itself in voting, where more than half of all votes are cast for one candidate.

All or more than two-thirds of all owners must be present during the competitive selection. In the absence of 2/3 of all residents of the house, the competition cannot be considered objective and the management company cannot be elected.

If the initiator of the competition is a local government, he himself appoints the management company or sums up his vote to the votes of residents.

Timing of selection

The management company must be elected within a month from the moment the house is put into operation. If this did not happen, the self-government body has the right to help the tenants make their choice for another month. Thus, the entire procedure for appointing a management company should not take more than two months.

Who has the right to initiate a tender?

Initiate a competition for the selection of a management company for an apartment building under the current Housing Code can only be:

Residents who choose a management company immediately after the completion of the new building.
Local self-government body - within a month, the administration should receive information about the organization serving the house. If this does not happen, the local self-government body independently initiates the election of a management company through a competition.

Herself the management company does not have the right to call tenants to meetings arrange meetings and sessions.

How to choose a management company for an apartment building?

Homeowners need to be critical in choosing a management company so that the organization suits all owners.

All residents of the apartment building must be warned about the choice in advance, for this, the evening round of apartments is most suitable (when all residents return from work) or informing by phone / sms / announcement at the entrance to the house.

Application for participation

Applications for participation are submitted on behalf of the management companies. They should indicate the name of the Criminal Code, the person in charge, the program under which cooperation should take place, conditions and contact information. You can accept an unlimited number of applications.

Notice

A notice of a competition for the selection of a managing organization must comply with a number of rules, and, first of all, be available to every owner.

Here main ways to notify owners:

personal notification of each owner by visiting the housing;
publication of information about the meeting in local media;
publication on the website of the local government;
notification by invitation to the mailbox;
placement of information on stands in each entrance;
call each owner.

Voting procedure when choosing a management company

First of all, it is necessary that the owners familiarize themselves with all applicants for the position of the management company even before the start of voting.

For this the time and date of the meeting is determined, and the information is posted on a common stand to which all owners have access. It is also possible to personally invite each owner to the meeting.

Without exception, all management companies can acquaint the owners with the terms of their cooperation through personal communication, distribution of leaflets, publication of articles on Internet resources.

On the day of the competitive selection, representatives of management companies, as well as most of the residents of the house, should appear. Representatives of organizations once again acquaint tenants with their conditions, offering certain clauses in the contract. Then voting begins, which can be either open or closed.

If the initiator of an open competition for the selection of a managing organization is a municipal body, then information about the meeting must also be conveyed to the owners, but the meeting will also require the presence of representatives of local governments.

Important! In the absence of unanimity in the vote, it is the representative of the local government that appoints the PC.

Opening of envelopes and consideration of applications

Applications are considered carefully and discussed directly at the meeting. From them, a list of the most worthy and credible candidates is formed, from which the winner is selected.

The moment of opening the envelopes with bids is recorded in the minutes of the meeting. Owners can ask questions to representatives, trying to get the most complete information.

Conducting a competition and summarizing its results

A competition for the selection of a managing organization for an apartment building is held immediately at the meeting, after all candidates have been presented.

When all the votes are recorded in the minutes, the result is announced. If the voting took place in the ballot format, the papers are not thrown away, but remain, in order to confirm the legitimacy of the victory of one or another management company, if necessary.

When the winner is announced, they discuss the prospects for a future contract with him, draw up a document and sign it. The rest of the nominees who did not get the required votes leave the meeting.

Sample minutes of the general meeting

Examples of drawing up the minutes of the general meeting at the choice of the management company are presented below.

How does the administration choose the UK?

Reference: if the tenants themselves did not elect a management company within the specified period (one month), then the selection and appointment of the manager is entrusted to the district administration.

In this case, the specialists appoint a competition among the management companies (both parties, the owners of the apartment building and all managing organizations that may participate in it, are notified of the competition without fail).

Actions of the administration in this process:

The developer can conclude a house management agreement with the management company no later than five days after the apartment building is put into operation. Residents of the house have the right within a month after putting the house into operation or leave the same company.

Conclusion of an agreement for the management of an apartment building

The final stage of the competition is. As a rule, it is drawn up in the presence of representatives of the owners and the management company.

Once again, all the details, the term of interaction, possible reasons for terminating the contract are discussed. After that, the contract is certified by a notary and signed by the parties.

The contract is signed in duplicate- one will be kept in the management company, the other - with the representative of the owners.

Residents can write down their wishes for property management, but be sure to coordinate this with a representative of the organization. As soon as the contract is signed, the management company can begin its direct duties.

What are the violations?

Violations of the choice of the Criminal Code are associated with the election process itself:

Any violation of the selection process entails not only the dissatisfaction of the tenants of the selected management company, but also jeopardizes the financial side of cooperation.

To appeal the identified violations, apartment owners do the following::

a statement about the discovery of a violation;
collect signatures from residents on consent and participation in the accusatory process;
collect the necessary evidence. This may be a video of the voting process, ballots, violations in the work of the management company, etc.

Persons who find violations should contact the prosecutor's office or the district court.

The competition for the selection of a managing organization for an apartment building is not as complicated as it might seem at first glance. Remember your rights as an owner, and then no one can infringe on them.

If you find an error, please highlight a piece of text and click Ctrl+Enter.

Alexander Grigoriev(TIN: 720304084519) is going to deceive his voters for the second time as a deputy of the Duma of Tyumen, and the owner of the Management Company "Universal". On June 3, the entrepreneur passed the primaries organized by the party's city organization "United Russia". He is going to run in 21 single-mandate constituencies of the city of Tyumen. Earlier, Grigoriev had already been elected a deputy of the Tyumen Duma in the fifth convocation of the city assembly in the same district. However, it is unlikely that Grigoriev's deputyship brought real benefit to the townspeople who voted for him.

Alexander Grigoriev

Campaign grid of Alexander Grigoriev

In this matter, one should take into account the professional specifics of the activities of Alexander Voldemarovich Grigoriev, which fits perfectly into the campaigning process. The thing is that Grigoriev is a 100% owner of an ordinary city management company. And this means that he has a ready-made campaign grid at hand. Moreover, almost all of his conscious life Grigoriev has worked in the housing and communal services sector, and he is well versed in the intricacies of managing apartment buildings and the specifics of relationships with people. Alexander Grigoriev became the director and owner of Universal Management Company eight years ago, having gone from an ordinary plumber to the commercial director of the company in 2003. Having headed LLC MC Universal in 2010, he was almost immediately elected to the Tyumen Duma with the help of gullible voters and administrative resources.

To begin with, about the administrative resource. In any city or region, the housing and communal services industry is considered a strategic direction in the economy and people's livelihoods. What is very important for power. Therefore, any enterprise operating in this area is an important tool for the authorities not only in economic matters, but also politically important. It is no coincidence that Alexander Grigoriev, in addition to being the owner of the company, is also a member of the United Russia party, and in general a “valuable person for the city”. His value is partly due to the fact that he has a reliable propaganda tool in his hands, which he has successfully used already once, and is going to use again. And in this case, the party in power will get its own person in the City Duma, and will increase the percentage of its “success” in the elections, which will then make it possible to report to the party authorities. And in order for this to happen, both the ruling party and Grigoriev himself are going to use ordinary citizens whose homes are served by the company.

This is the same propaganda network. As a rule, it consists of ordinary employees of the "manager" - locksmiths, plumbers, foremen of operational sites. But the most valuable thing is the activists of house councils, the elders in the entrances and just active residents who expect to receive some preferences from the management company for their activity. At the same time, they are leaders of public opinion in their house, entrance, or landing. Preferences, as a rule, relate to issues of building management, repairs in entrances, etc. But it also happens that some particularly active citizen will have a loggia glazed for free, or the plumbing will be repaired.

“And some, especially trusted persons, have the authority to sign acceptance certificates for some home improvement work (for example, roof repairs). In this case, funds collected from residents are debited from the account of the house, and a special trustee receives a bonus from the management company. Only the rest do not know about it, say, if the work was not completed in full, or not completed at all, ”the Charter said. no interlocutor from among the owners of the house, which serves the management company "Universal" Alexander Grigoriev.

Some of these people are engaged in campaigning on a professional basis. Since the management companies in the conditions of constant competition for the right to manage the housing stock simply hire "special people" for money to campaign in their favor. All of them form the backbone of Alexander Grigoriev's campaign network.

"Fruits of Promotion"

Considering that the company currently manages 169 apartment buildings with a total area of 67,557,705 square meters, one can imagine what a huge campaign force this is. However, any campaign has the opposite effect. Especially when you consider that most of the management companies in Tyumen, included in the list of the ten largest, can hardly be called conscientious companies providing housing and communal services. Management Company "Universal" takes the 8th place in this rating. Social media users are extremely negative about her. Maintenance of houses is accompanied by huge additional extortions in the form of illegal charges, a large number of accidents, and poor-quality work of employees. In 2016, Universal Management Company LLC topped the list of 20 debtors for consumed heat to the heat supply organization Teplo Tyumen. In 2017, the debt amounted to 58 million 013 thousand 979 rubles. In 2017, 14 apartment buildings refused the services of the company. Here are just a few reviews of consumers of the services of the Management Company "Universal", and by the way, voters of the city:

Owner Ilya: “In January 2018, a line appeared in the receipt for common house needs of 2000 rubles, supposedly a debt for 2015. How can there be a debt if I paid monthly for water for general needs of 17,18,12 and 5 cubic meters. No repairs are carried out, the basement is leaking, the cold water and hot water risers are constantly breaking down, flooding the lower floors.

GZhI closes his eyes as usual, (write we will answer). How much can you steal. Entrance and staircase in a terrible state. Olympiyskaya st., 12a.

Owner Lyubov: “February 12, 2018 at 13:10 Quality of service: “30 Years of Pobeda Street 115 And for water supply for general house needs, payment is regularly taken in January as much as 375 rubles, and in the corridors and garbage chutes they only hang posters so that they would look after the sanitary condition, and cleaning is not done for months. It doesn’t even sweep, let alone wash.”

Owner Alexander: “The company is very bad. I've been calling the department for accrual of housing and communal services for a whole week. Nobody picks up the phone. I decide to apply to the housing inspection of the Tyumen region, ”the homeowners report on the website of Universal Management Company LLC.

Meanwhile, the revenue of Alexander Grigoriev's company for the last reporting year alone amounted to 339 million rubles. Its cost is 9 million 400 thousand rubles with an authorized capital of 10 thousand. So it turns out that the candidate for the Duma of Tyumen, and the owner of the management company "Universal" Alexander Grigoriev is robbing consumers of the company's services, and is going to deceive his voters, as he already did during his first term as a deputy.

Housing

The best choice is inaction

The Temptations and Dangers of Managing Multi-Family Residential Buildings

As you know, the owners of apartments in a large apartment building are now faced with a choice - should they create an HOA? Or choose a management company? Or maybe it’s better to do nothing at all, entrusting the solution of all housing maintenance problems to the municipality?

The truth about HOA

The option of creating an HOA, in my opinion, is the most inappropriate, because. its appeal is based solely on a few ingrained myths.

The partnership of owners is supposedly the most profitable form of managing a house. Propaganda for the creation of homeowners associations has been carried out by the authorities at all levels for many years and is aimed at shifting the burden of responsibility for the maintenance of housing onto the shoulders of the population. At the beginning of this propaganda campaign, the form of management with the help of management companies was not tested, so the HOA became the subject of praise. Homeowners' associations are created for 1-2 houses, because with more houses, they become unmanageable and lose their only advantage - the personal acquaintance of all members as the basis of trust in the organization. At the same time, such a small size of HOAs makes them economically unprofitable. The management costs, divided into a small number of apartments, turn out to be unreasonably high.

Homeowners' associations, as if, can work better than management companies, because. management is carried out by people who live in the house, "they themselves live here and will not do bad things to their house." In practice, this means that the leadership is carried out by amateurs. Many homeowners' associations understood this danger and, in fact, turned into professional management companies. Those who could not do this should seriously think about liquidating the HOA.

Homeowners' associations are allegedly more sensitive to the needs of residents. However, unlike management companies, the factor of personal preferences of the management of the HOA plays a significant role in the work. In the HOA, there are frequent cases when the head openly discriminates against individual tenants, whom for some reason he did not love. With management companies, for example, this simply cannot be, because. the parties are bound by the agreement. The truth about management companies

The process of choosing management companies is now actively going on in almost all houses in the city. Owners of apartments are invited to their place by several companies at once. It seems that the process is going on in conditions of fair competition, and the tenants only have to make a choice. In practice, everything is more difficult.

Agitation of management companies is carried out under an attractive slogan: "You yourself will determine where your money will go." Many tenants melt at the mere mention of it. But no one sees the most serious problem: such an approach, at least, means that the management company shifts responsibility for maintaining the house onto the shoulders of the tenants themselves. Imagine that you went to the post office to send a letter, and you are told: "Now you will determine how to deliver your letter." Before, you put a stamp on the envelope, threw the letter in the mailbox and no more problems - you were sure that the letter would be delivered even if the train on which it was going to be transported was canceled. Will you consider it a virtue that you will have to solve all the issues related to the delivery of a letter on your own? Hardly. Then why does everyone consider it attractive to independently solve the issues of managing a residential building?! Isn't it a great conquest that after paying the due amount of utility bills, no one thinks about why there is hot water in the tap, the lights are on and gas is flowing?

Previously, apartment owners paid the housing maintenance organization for maintaining a certain condition of the house, established in sanitary and other norms and rules: engineering systems are in good order, the yard is clean, the roof does not leak, etc. Now, instead of maintaining housing in proper condition, it is proposed to pay for certain types of work. The difference is cardinal! According to the draft contracts offered by management companies, residents (customers) are forced to negotiate with the management company (contractor) on the performance of work for the money already paid. From the management of the management company it is impossible to get an intelligible answer to the question of what will happen if the apartment owners consider the estimate proposed by the management company to be too high, because they have nowhere to go - the money has already been paid.

Homeowners are very positive about the availability of separate personal accounts for each house. It is not clear why, but the residents of each house believe that the neighboring houses lived off their payments. Many republics within the former USSR also thought so... However, a "common pot" for payments for home repairs is economically justified and simply necessary! Indeed, if tomorrow, due to some emergency, your house needs repairs (a tree has fallen and damaged the roof), then you will have to wait until the necessary amount is accumulated on the personal account of the house. The "common cauldron" allows us to somehow resolve these issues, although it also has flaws. But the rejection of it imposes great risks on the owners of apartments. There are no other ways, for example, special forms of insurance, yet. And most importantly, if the guardians for personal accounts counted the amounts that they protect from encroachment, they would shed tears ...

The decision to choose a management company in practice is made, as a rule, by pensioners. They have free time, they are used to trusting the authorities, who say: "Don't be late! Tomorrow will be too late"! But these people, as a rule, are incompetent, they can be easily deceived and forced to make the "right" choice in favor of the management company, which uses professional agitators for these purposes.

The draft contracts proposed by the companies have many flaws and pitfalls, up to limiting the liability of the management company to the amount of funds collected from the house. Draft contracts are sometimes difficult even for a lawyer to understand, they are so superficial and do not contain real obligations. The attitude of management companies towards them can be judged even by the fact that the owners are rushing to make a choice right at a meeting in the courtyard of the house, saying that changes to the contract can be agreed upon and then in working order.

The very attempt of management companies to conclude contracts with each house on individual terms is suspicious. So one house will have a better deal than the other? Even the most qualified manager will get confused in 70 contracts with different conditions, namely, this is the volume of housing stock in the management of an average company. Only standard service conditions for all houses can be economically calculated and implemented.

The authorities provide tacit support to individual companies. However, after the choice made by the tenants, all responsibility lies with the tenants themselves and there will be no one to complain about. The conclusion from all of the above suggests itself: there is no need to create an HOA, or choose a management company now. We, homeowners, do not yet have the experience, knowledge, or information to make the right choice. Our business is to pay and use communal benefits, and not to check calculations and adjust contracts. Surely, in the future, homeowners will learn all this, the terms of standard contracts will be settled, management companies will stop treating tenants as when selling Herbalife. In the future we will choose, but not now...

Let the municipality make the first choice: it has both specialists and opportunities. We chose the government to solve our problems and bear responsibility for it.

A change in the management company is one of the most popular reasons for calling a general meeting. And, as practice shows, the transition from one management company to another does not always go smoothly. Those who disagree with the voting results are challenging the protocol in the courts. And often the ministers of Themis recognize the meeting as illegitimate. The reason for this is all sorts of violations of the procedure for holding a gathering of residents. To talk about how to change the Criminal Code or create an HOA, City News carefully studied the current housing legislation, and also talked to experts. The algorithm of actions of the owners, if they decide to abandon the services of the former managers, is prescribed in the Housing Code (LC RF). And the change of the Criminal Code and the creation of an HOA is possible only with the decision of the general meeting. And in order for the decision of people to be legitimate, you need to follow the following rules.

1. Any owner or group of owners can be the initiator of the general meeting. At the same time, last year changes were made to the Housing Code of the Russian Federation, according to which residents have the right to entrust the organization of the general meeting of their Criminal Code, HOA or Housing Construction Cooperative. It is necessary that owners holding at least ten percent of the votes ask the managing organization about it in writing. In the appeal, it is necessary to indicate the issues to be included in the agenda of the meeting. In order to convene and hold a meeting, housing residents have 45 days from the date of receipt of the application. “The most cynical residents can ask their Criminal Code to hold a meeting to terminate the contract with themselves and choose a new company, and housing residents have no right to refuse this,” Roman Kazakov, chairman of the public movement “People’s Control in Housing and Public Utilities,” emphasizes.

Sometimes only after the change of the management company in the management of the house there are positive changes.

2. The initiator of the meeting forms the agenda, chooses the form of holding and notifies the owners of the gathering no later than ten days before the date of its holding. Within the specified period, a notice of holding a general meeting must be sent to each owner by registered mail or delivered personally against signature. As experts say, it is often the failure to comply with this requirement that leads to the fact that people's decisions are recognized as illegal. Every time you need to hold a meeting, personally handing the announcement to each owner is problematic, but the law provides a way out of the situation.

3. The most realistic form of holding a general meeting is face-to-face. Thus, if the quorum could not be reached in person (less than half of the residents came to the meeting), there is no need to initiate a new meeting, but you can immediately start absentee voting. Only the owners can express their opinion on certain issues on the agenda, just people registered in the apartment do not have the right to vote.

Important! The General Meeting is not entitled to make decisions on issues not included in the agenda, as well as change it.

4. Depending on the issues raised, the number of votes for a decision may vary. So, if we are talking about the reconstruction of a house, then people should vote for it unanimously, if current repairs are required, then two-thirds of the votes are enough, most issues, like changing the method of management, are decided by a simple majority (50 percent plus one vote).

Unfortunately, such a stir happens only around social security, as practice shows, no more than 10 people come to the meeting. The initiators have to catch the rest of the owners apartment by apartment.

Important! The decision of the general meeting is binding on all owners of premises in an apartment building, including those residents who did not vote.

5. The results of the general meeting are documented in minutes.

Important! Decisions and minutes of the general meeting of owners of premises in an apartment building are official documents. Forgery is punishable by law.

6. Within ten days after the meeting, the initiator of the meeting is obliged to transfer a copy of the protocol to his management company, HOA or housing cooperative. The managing organization, in turn, is obliged to transfer a copy of this protocol to the housing supervision service within five days. In addition, within ten days the initiator is obliged to notify the owners of the voting results.

The minutes of the general meeting must be submitted to the Criminal Code for execution.

Important! If several copies of protocols from the same house at meetings with a similar agenda get into the construction supervision within three months, this will be the basis for an unscheduled inspection.

7. Thus, the decision of the general meeting comes into force at the moment when the document is checked by the housing supervision service. Consequently, the contract with the former management company will be terminated at the moment when the house is excluded from the license.

8. If, following the results of the general meeting, the residents decided to conclude an agreement with the new management company, then, in fact, the participation of the initiators in the process of changing the company ends here. The new organization itself will demand from the former technical documentation for the house, the funds accumulated on the account of the house, and will also conclude agreements with resource-supplying organizations. If, as a result of voting, a decision was made to create an HOA, then before the partnership starts managing the house, it must be registered. To do this, the elected board pays the appropriate fee, notarizes the application for registration, which is written on a special form (it can be obtained from the tax service), and, together with the charter approved at the meeting, submits for registration to the nearest inspection of the Federal Tax Service.

Important! At the state registration of the HOA, the minutes of the general meeting of owners are also submitted, at which decisions were made to establish a partnership and approve its charter, as well as information about the persons who voted at the general meeting for the creation of a homeowners' association, about the shares belonging to these persons in the right of common ownership of common property in an apartment building.

On a note

How best to formulate the protocol clause on informing owners about general meetings and their results

"Determine that the notification of the owners of the premises about the holding of general meetings will be carried out by placing a notice on information stands, bulletin boards, access doors and other places available for viewing by the owners in the entrances and (or) outside the entrances, but within the boundaries of the local area.

Determine that informing the owners of the premises about the decisions taken by the general meeting of owners will be carried out by placing an appropriate announcement or a copy of the minutes of the general meeting on information stands, bulletin boards, access doors and other places available for viewing by the owners in the entrances and (or) outside the entrances, but within the boundaries of the local area.

To the point

What must be included in a notice of a meeting?

1) information about the initiator;

2) the form of holding this meeting (in-person, absentee or in-person voting);

3) the date, place, time of this meeting or, if this meeting is held in the form of absentee voting, the closing date for the adoption of decisions of the owners on the issues put to the vote, and the place or address where such decisions should be transmitted;

4) agenda;

5) the procedure for getting acquainted with the information and (or) materials that will be presented at this meeting, and the place or address where they can be found.

Where to get comprehensive advice on organizing and holding a general meeting.

"Gorodskiye novosti" collected on one map all consulting centers on housing and communal services operating in Krasnoyarsk. The services of all these institutions are free. Municipal authorities and state authorities are marked in red, resource centers for management of housing associations and the development of local self-government are marked in blue, public organizations are in green.

MKU "Department for work with HOAs and the development of local self-government"

Resource center "Department for work with HOAs and the development of local self-government"

st. Oktyabrskaya, 3, tel. 277-58-29

st. 40 years of Victory, 4, tel. 225-02-14

st. Kirova, 2, tel. 227-28-85

st. Youth, 39, tel. 264-60-38

st. Pionerskaya Pravda, 8, tel. 260-00-71

Public movement "People's control in housing and communal services"

Contacts: st. Gorky, 10, tel. 288-16-10, website: NKZhKH.RF, e-mail: [email protected]

Opening hours: Monday - Friday, from 9 to 18 hours, lunch break from 13 to 14

Department of Housing and Public Utilities of the Administrations of the Central District

Contacts: Mira Ave., 63, tel. 227-94065, website: admkrsk.ru, e-mail: [email protected]

Opening hours: Monday - Friday, from 9 to 18 hours, lunch break from 13 to 14

Consultative and legal center on the organization of the provision of housing and communal services to the population under the Ministry of Housing and Public Utilities of the Territory