Why is the procurement plan not accepted for control. Financial control in the formation of the procurement plan. Unified information system in the field of procurement

January 20, 2017, 13:44, question #1506199 Ekaterina, Volgograd

Collapse

Lawyers Answers (5)

Sachenkov Alexey

Lawyer, Moscow

10661 response
3549 reviews

Good afternoon! Why isn't it sent for control? What is the problem?

If you are a unitary enterprise, then you do not need to post zero procurement plans and schedules, since, for example, Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 21, 2013 N 1043 (as amended on October 29, 2014) “On the requirements for the formation, approval and maintenance of procurement plans for goods , works, services to meet the needs of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation and municipal needs, as well as the requirements for the form of procurement plans for goods, works, services "in subparagraphs" c "and" d "of paragraph 3 of the Requirements for the formation, approval and maintenance of procurement plans for goods, works , services to meet the needs of the subject of the Russian Federation and municipal needs (approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 21, 2013 N 1043), states:

3. Procurement plans are approved within 10 working days by the following customers:
d) budgetary, autonomous institutions created by a constituent entity of the Russian Federation (municipal formation), state unitary enterprises whose property belongs to the constituent entities of the Russian Federation by right of ownership, or municipal unitary enterprises that carry out purchases within the framework of the state bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation transferred to them, management bodies of territorial by state off-budget funds or local self-government bodies of the powers of a state customer (municipal customer) to conclude and execute state contracts (municipal contracts) on behalf of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (municipalities) on behalf of these bodies, in the cases provided for by Part 6 of Article 15 of the Federal Law - from the date of bringing to the appropriate personal account for the transferred powers the scope of rights in monetary terms to accept and (or) fulfill obligations in accordance with the budget law agency of the Russian Federation.
GARANT system: base.garant.ru/70514250/#ixzz4W7g8vo3s

Accordingly, if you do not have these events, then you do not have the obligation to place a procurement plan! According to the schedule, the situation is similar!

Was the lawyer's answer helpful? + 0 - 0

Collapse

Clarification of the client

Question: For several days we have not been able to place a plan in the EIS - a procurement schedule, the system gives errors, although we are doing everything right. We wrote to the support service of the site many times, no result. Tell me, is there any way we can get permission to conclude contracts, without a schedule plan posted? Maybe the regulatory body will meet us and allow us to conclude contracts?

Answer: To date, the unified information system in the field of procurement is extremely unstable, malfunctions constantly occur, this is due to a change in the functionality of the EIS, due to the entry into force of certain norms of legislation on the federal contract system.

In accordance with Part 11 of Article 21 of Federal Law-44, customers make purchases in accordance with the information included in the schedules in accordance with Part 3 of Article 21 of Federal Law-44. Purchases that are not provided for by the schedules cannot be carried out.

As can be seen from the above article of the law, you do not have the right to conclude contracts only if they are not provided for by the procurement schedule plan. The law does not provide for any restrictions for customers in the absence of a posted procurement schedule plan in the EIS. Since, at the moment, your schedule plan has been formed and approved, you can carry out the purchases that are provided for by it, despite the fact that it is not published in the EIS, it is not required to coordinate the conclusion of contracts in accordance with the regulatory authority.

With regard to the violation of the deadlines for publishing a procurement schedule plan in the EIS due to technical failures in the operation of the site, one should remember the norms of part 2 of Article 2.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, according to which a legal entity is found guilty of an administrative offense if it is established that it had the opportunity to comply with the rules and norms for the violation of which the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation or the laws of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation provide for administrative liability, but this person did not take all measures depending on them to comply with them.

Therefore, in the event of technical failures in the operation of the UIS, as a result of which for a long time you do not have the opportunity to post information within the required time frame provided for by law, in order to avoid administrative liability, we recommend that you:

Make a “screen copy” from the EIS website to confirm that you have made attempts to post a procurement schedule plan;
Draw up a protocol on the impossibility of placing a schedule plan in the EIS due to technical failures;
Send letters to the site support service with a request to take measures to eliminate technical failures.

In connection with the release of version 8.1 of the unified information system in the field of procurement (hereinafter referred to as the UIS), the Federal Treasury sends for methodological guidance the activities of the Territorial bodies of the Federal Treasury (hereinafter referred to as the Control Bodies) updated Methodological Recommendations on the procedure for exercising control in the field of procurement provided for by part 5 of Article 99 Federal Law No. 44-FZ of 05.04.2013 “On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs”, including taking into account the procedure for monitoring customers that fall under the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 27.11. 2017 No. 1428 "On the peculiarities of procurement for the needs of the country's defense and state security."

Additionally, as part of the release of version 8.1 of the UIS and the launch of new functionality of the UIS in the personal account of the Control Authority, we are sending the following documents for accounting and use in work:

1) a quick user guide regarding the specifics of working with the functionality of version 8.1 of the EIS when exercising the control provided for by part 5 of article 99 of the Federal Law of 04/05/2013 No. needs", as well as verification of contracts included in the register of contracts concluded by customers, in accordance with the Rules for maintaining the register of contracts concluded by customers, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on November 28, 2013 No. 1084 "On the procedure for maintaining the register of contracts concluded by customers, and the register of contracts containing information constituting a state secret”;

2) a brief user guide regarding the implementation features in version 8.1 of the EIS of the requirements of Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated November 27, 2017 No. 1428 “On the specifics of procurement for the needs of the country's defense and state security”.

Application: for 26 l. in 1 copy.

R.E. Artyukhin

Unified information system in the field of procurement

Quick User Guide

In terms of the features of working with the functionality of the unified information system in the field of procurement version 8.1 when exercising the control provided for by Part 5 of Art. 99 of the Federal Law of 05.04.2013 No. 44-FZ "On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs", as well as verification of contracts included in the register of contracts concluded by customers, in accordance with the Rules for maintaining the register contracts concluded by customers, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on November 28, 2013 No. 1084 (hereinafter, respectively - Law No. 44-FZ, Decree No. 1084)

The document is drawn up on 23 sheets

annotation

This document is an addendum to the user manual "Authority authorized to exercise control in accordance with Part 5 of Article 99 of Federal Law No. 44-FZ".

1. Features of the formation, placement, direction for control and control of the procurement plan, provided for in Part 5 of Art. 99 of Law No. 44-FZ

See section 4.3.3 for details. user manual "Authority authorized to exercise control in accordance with Part 5 of Article 99 of Federal Law No. 44-FZ"".

1.1. For customers who are recipients of budgetary funds, as well as in the case of transferring the powers of a state (municipal) customer to them in accordance with paragraph 6 of Art. 15 of Law No. 44-FZ

The functionality of the LC OK has been improved to control the compliance of the volume of financial support of the procurement plan with the adjusted limits of budget obligations in the context of budget classification codes (hereinafter - BCC), including in an automated way through the interaction of the UIS with the Automated System of the Federal Treasury (hereinafter - AS FC).

Upon receipt of the procurement plans of such customers for control in the OK LC, the controlled information will be displayed in the context of the CCM.

At the same time, the automation of such control is provided for in the LC OK of the Federal Treasury in relation to the procurement plans of customers that are federal authorities, federal state institutions, other organizations in the event that the powers of the state customer are transferred to them in accordance with part 6 of article 15 of Law No. 44-FZ , as well as customers making purchases on behalf of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation (municipal formation) in the event of transfer of authority for control to the Federal Treasury and maintaining personal accounts with the Federal Treasury.

The statuses of the formation of control results in the AS FC are indicated in the OK LC automatically in the “Control status” field, as well as in the Event Log of the control object, where the main events of data processing in the AS FC are recorded, including errors during data processing (see Figure 1). ).

- "Request sent to the RMP" - is assigned if information about the procurement plan is sent to the AS FC management subsystem;

- "Delivered to the DSP" - is assigned if a message is received from AS FC about receiving information about the procurement plan;

- “Not delivered to the DSP” - is assigned if the information on the procurement plan is not delivered to AS FC;

After the control result is received from AS FC in the OK LC, the automatically generated control results will be displayed on the “Information to be controlled” tab (see Figure 2), and in the case of a negative control for a specific BCF, the amount for which the comparison was carried out will be displayed.

The connection of the LC OK of the Federal Treasury bodies to the EIS functionality for automated control of the procurement plan will be carried out in stages in accordance with official notifications from the Federal Treasury.

Please note that for the LC OK of the financial authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (municipalities) and the management bodies of state extra-budgetary funds (hereinafter, respectively - financial authorities, OUGVF), the functionality for automated control of procurement plans is not provided.

At the same time, control in the context of the CSC in the LC OK of financial bodies and the OUGVF, as well as the bodies of the Federal Treasury (in the period before connecting to the automated control functionality) must be carried out manually for each payment period (fiscal year, the first year of the planning period, the second year of the planning period ).

1.2. For budgetary and autonomous institutions

In order to comply with the provisions of subparagraph “a” of paragraph 13 of the Rules for the implementation of control provided for by part 5 of Article 99 of Law No. 44-FZ, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1367 dated December 12, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as Rules No. and autonomous institutions to make purchases even if the total amount of financial security specified in the procurement plans of such institutions exceeds the corresponding amount of financial security specified in their financial and economic activity plan (hereinafter - FEP), provided that other indicators of the procurement plan are consistent and PFCD to each other, as well as not exceeding the amount specified in the procurement plan for the current financial year over the corresponding indicator of PFCD.

At the same time, the LC OK implemented the functionality for automated control of the compliance of the final volume of financial support of the procurement plan, for compliance with the indicators of the PFCD posted on the Official website on the Internet for posting information about state and municipal institutions BUS.GOV.RU (hereinafter referred to as GMU) , according to the year of commencement of the procurement.

Upon receipt of the procurement plan of a budgetary, autonomous institution for control in the OK LC, controlled information will be displayed in the context of the year the procurement began. The control body needs to wait for the formation of the draft control result in automatic mode.

The stages of processing a request for obtaining indicators from the HMU can be tracked in the "Control Status" field and in the Event Log of the controlled object, where the main events of data processing at the HMU are recorded, including displaying errors during data processing (see Figure 3).

In this case, the following control states can be:

- “A request was sent to the State Medical University” - is assigned when a request is sent to the State Medical University for obtaining PFCD indicators to control the procurement plan;

- "Delivered to GMU" - is assigned if a request for obtaining PFCD indicators has been delivered to the GMU to control the procurement plan;

- "Not delivered to the GMU" - is assigned if the request for obtaining PFCD indicators is not delivered to the GMU;

- “Draft Control Result Formed” - is assigned if a draft Notification of Compliance of Controlled Information or a Protocol of Non-Compliance of Controlled Information has been generated, but the result has not yet been signed;

- "Control result signed" - is assigned if the control result is generated and signed.

After receiving the PFC values from the HMU, the tab "Information to be controlled" will display automatically generated control results (see Figure 4).

The result of the control is formed by comparing, for each year of the start of the procurement, included in the planning period (fiscal year, the first year of the planning period, the second year of the planning period) the amount of financial security for all IPCs for which purchases are planned in the corresponding year (the first two digits of the IPC are the same with the last two digits of the year) and the amount indicated in the FCD on line 2001 in columns 7, 8, 9 for the corresponding years of the purchase. The total values for IHI by years will be calculated automatically, and the list of such IHI will be displayed in the list under the total values. If a discrepancy between the amounts for a specific year of the start of the procurement is revealed, for all the IPC for this year the result “Not Passed” will be set.

Thus, if the volume of financial security in the procurement plan for the current financial year does not exceed the amount of the corresponding indicator of PFCD, and the excess is recorded only in terms of the indicators of the planning period, then the procurement by budgetary and autonomous institutions with a positive result of the control of the procurement schedule, notification on the implementation of the procurement and procurement documentation in the current financial year will not be blocked, despite the excess of the total amount of financial security.

1.3. For federal state unitary enterprises that make purchases at the expense of subsidies provided to them from the federal budget for capital investments in objects of federal property or the acquisition of real estate objects in federal property (hereinafter - FSUE)

In the LC OK, in connection with the control of the FSUE procurement plan for information about the accepted budget obligations registered under agreements on the provision of FSUE subsidies for capital investments in federal property or the acquisition of real estate objects in federal property (hereinafter referred to as the agreements), the functionality for exercising control has been implemented conformity of the final volume of financial support of the FSUE procurement plan, broken down by agreements, to compliance with the accepted BOs under such agreements.

At the same time, upon receipt of the procurement plan of a federal state unitary enterprise for control in the OK LC, controlled information will be displayed in the context of agreements (see Figure 5).

The control body needs to carry out such control manually using the search service of the expenditure management subsystem of the state integrated information system for managing public finances "Electronic budget" (hereinafter referred to as PUR EB) or AS FC to find information about the registered BO of the recipient of budgetary funds that provided the subsidy to FSUE ( for example, by the subsidy agreement number). The control body must check the information on the amount of financial support for the procurement plan (for a specific subsidy) for not exceeding the amount of the corresponding BO (control is carried out by year).

Also, in order to comply with the provisions of subparagraph “b” of paragraph 13 of Regulation No. 1367 in terms of controlling the FSUE procurement plan, as well as ensuring the continuity of the procurement process, the UIS has implemented functionality that allows FSUE procurement to be carried out, even if the procurement plan has not passed the control on compliance with the accepted BO, provided that other objects of control correspond to each other.

1.4. Procurement plan containing information on procurement outside the planning period (in relation to procurement plans of authorities, state institutions, budgetary institutions and autonomous institutions)

Functionality has been implemented to form the EIS in the Personal Account of the Customer (hereinafter referred to as the Customer's Personal Account) and provide for control, provided for in subparagraph "a" of paragraph 13 of Regulation No. 1367, information confirming the possibility of making a purchase outside the planning period in the cases specified in paragraph 3 of Article 72 Budget Code of the Russian Federation.

When specifying financial security in the position of the procurement plan in the column "Amount for subsequent years" by the customer on the tab "Information on procurement for subsequent years" (see Figure), the grounds for such purchases should be entered in accordance with Appendix No. 5 to the Procedure for Interaction of the Federal Treasury with the subjects of control specified in paragraphs 3 and 6 of Regulation No. 1367, approved by order of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated 04.07.2016 No. 104n.

Such information will be provided for control in the OK LC as part of the procurement plan when it is sent for control from the Customer's LC. The specified information will be displayed in the OK LC on the tab "Control for compliance with legal acts" (see Figure). According to such information, a specialist of the control body needs to carry out visual control. In the event of a discrepancy between controlled information, procurement under the relevant procurement identification code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC) will be blocked.

Please note that the formation and submission of information on regulatory legal acts confirming the possibility of procurement outside the planning period (hereinafter referred to as NPA), budgetary, autonomous institutions is carried out similarly to the functionality developed for the Customer's LC, which is a state (municipal) customer (see Figure ).

At the same time, information about the NPA of the specified customers is displayed in the OK LC on the same tab with information on the compliance of the information of the procurement plan with the indicators of PFCD (see Figure 8)

2. Features of the formation, placement, direction for control and control of the procurement schedule provided for by Part 5 of Article 99 of Law No. 44-FZ

In order to optimize the implementation of the control of procurement schedules, provided for by the provisions of subparagraph "c" of paragraph 13 of Regulation No. 1367, as well as to ensure correct control over the amount of financial support brought to procurement, the UIS has implemented functionality that allows you to generate a positive result of control according to the plan the procurement schedule if the IPC complies with the procurement plan and the actual non-exceedance of the amount of financial support allocated for procurement (including when clarifying payments based on the results of the achieved savings).

The OK LC implemented automatic control over the compliance of procurement schedules with procurement plans by checking only for compliance with the IPC, for non-exceedance of planned payments in the context of such IPC in the next financial year and planning period and the amounts of payments outside the planning period over the volume of the corresponding financial security in the procurement plans, as well as for the passage of the appropriate control by the IPC in the procurement plan (inconsistency in the justifications for the amounts for subsequent years, or inconsistency in the volumes of the procurement plan for PFCD).

At the same time, control over the compliance of the NMCC with the volume of financial support in the procurement plan is not carried out, since in the general case it is redundant due to the compliance of the NMCC with the planned payments (such compliance is ensured by format-logical controls at the stage of formation of the procurement schedule in the customer's personal account). In a particular case, the NMCC does not indicate the actual amount of payments, but is only necessary for bidding (for example, the conclusion of an energy service contract in accordance with Article 108 of Law No. 44-FZ), cannot be determined in numerical terms (in this case it is indicated in the form of a formula (purchase of services for the sale of state property), or does not display the amount of payments after the planned payments are clarified based on the results of savings, since the NMCC is not subject to change.

Also implemented is the display in the OK LC of the relevant controlled information on the tab "Information subject to control" (see Figure 9).

See section 4.3.4 for details. user manual "Authority authorized to exercise control in accordance with Part 5 of Article 99 of Federal Law No. 44-FZ".

3. Features of the formation, control and placement of notices on the implementation of the procurement and documentation on the procurement of organizations of the federal level

See section 4.3.5 for details. user manual "Authority authorized to exercise control in accordance with Part 5 of Article 99 of Federal Law No. 44-FZ".

3.1. For government customers generating information on budget commitments

To control notifications on the implementation of procurement and documentation on the procurement of state customers that form information on the budgetary obligations assumed in accordance with the Procedure for accounting by the territorial bodies of the Federal Treasury of budgetary and monetary obligations of recipients of federal budget funds, approved by order of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated December 30, 2015 No. 221n (hereinafter respectively - PBO, Procedure No. 221n), functionality has been implemented to automatically generate a positive control result in the event that information about the PBO is generated based on such a notice of procurement in the UIS.

The connection of these customers to the functionality for generating information about PBO in the UIS will be carried out in stages in accordance with the official notifications of the Federal Treasury.

If the customer is included in the Site Operator’s settings for using the functionality for generating information about the PBP in the UIS, such a customer will not be able to send notifications about the purchase for control until the corresponding PBP is registered in the ES DSP.

Thus, if a notice of procurement is received for control, indicating that the corresponding PBO formed in the EIS is registered, the draft control result for such a notice will be automatically generated in the OK LC (see Figure).

In the event that the PBO was registered without using the UIS functionality, the control result for such a notification will not be automatically generated in the OK LC.

At the same time, the Control Authority independently, by searching for this PBO in the AS FC and (or) in the RPS EB, will additionally need to visually control the amount specified in the information on the PBP in the AS FC and RDP EB, the initial (maximum) price of the contract (hereinafter - IMCC ) specified in the notice of procurement. It is also necessary to carry out additional control over the compliance of the CSC specified in the PBO with the CSC contained in the current posted version of the procurement plan.

The verification of the notice on the implementation of the procurement for compliance with the IPC and NMCC specified in the schedule for the procurement of goods, works, services (hereinafter referred to as the procurement schedule) will be carried out automatically.

Please note that the function of posting a notice of procurement in the EIS becomes unavailable to customers if the Control Body issues a protocol on non-compliance of controlled information on it for the following reasons:

NMCC in the notice of procurement does not correspond to similar information in the procurement schedule;

NMTsK, specified in the notice of procurement, does not correspond to the amount of PBO;

PBO on the notification of the procurement is not registered;

The CSCs specified in the PBO are not included in the procurement plan;

Negative control of the procurement plan and the procurement schedule due to the failure to provide in the procurement plan for the relevant IPC justification for the availability of amounts outside the planning period.

Please note that if, based on the results of the control of the procurement plan, a protocol was issued on the inconsistency of the controlled information due to the excess of financial support for the BCC over the corresponding limits of budget obligations, according to notices of the procurement (in the absence of relevant violations of the NMCC and IPC) according to this CSC will be able to obtain a positive control if there is a free balance of funds on the front for procurement.

Upon receipt in the Customer's LC of a protocol on non-compliance of controlled information on a notice of procurement, the customer needs to generate changes to it and re-send it for control (see Figure 9).

3.2. For federal budgetary and autonomous institutions

The Customer's LC implements the functionality of blocking the placement of a notice of procurement, if a protocol on non-compliance with at least one of the identified violations was received from the Control Body:

The corresponding IPC was not found in the procurement schedule;

NMCC does not correspond to similar information in the procurement schedule;

The IPC in the procurement schedule did not pass control due to the identified violations in the IPC of the procurement plan (no justification was provided for the availability of amounts for subsequent years or the amount of financial support for the current financial year did not pass control for compliance with PFCD).

Upon receipt of a protocol on non-compliance of controlled information, the customer needs to generate changes and re-send a notification for control (see Figure 9).

3.3. For federal state unitary enterprises

3. The customer's personal account has the functionality of blocking the placement of a notice of procurement if a protocol on non-compliance with at least one of the identified violations was received from the Control Body:

The corresponding IPC was not found in the procurement schedule;

NMCC does not correspond to similar information in the procurement schedule.

At the same time, such control is carried out in a fully automated mode.

Upon receipt of a protocol on non-compliance of controlled information, the customer needs to generate changes and re-send a notice of procurement for control (see Figure).

4. Prohibition of placement by federal-level customers in the EIS of the final protocol for determining the supplier (contractor, performer) in the event that a non-compliance protocol is issued on it

Implemented a ban on the placement by federal customers of the final protocol for determining the supplier (contractor, performer) (hereinafter referred to as the OPPI) in the event that a non-compliance protocol is issued on it due to a discrepancy between the information contained in the OPPI and the information specified in the procurement documentation (in the absence of documentation , in the notice of procurement), in part:

Excess of the contract price proposed by the procurement participant, the recognized winner of the supplier (contractor, performer) determination, the only participant whose application is recognized as complying with the requirements of Law No. purchases);

Exceeding the price of the contract concluded with a single supplier (contractor, performer) over the NMTsK specified in the procurement documentation (in the absence of documentation, in the notice of procurement).

See section 4.3.6 for details. user manual "Authority authorized to exercise control in accordance with Part 5 of Article 99 of Federal Law No. 44-FZ"".

5. Change in the conduct of control under Part 5 of Art. 99 of Law No. 44-FZ, according to Rules No. 1084, according to Order No. 221n of information included in the register of contracts concluded by customers, in terms of minimizing manual filling in of control results

In order to ensure the convenience of monitoring information included in the register of contracts concluded by customers (hereinafter referred to as the Register of Contracts) provided for by the provisions of subparagraph "c" of paragraph 13 of Rules No. 1367, paragraph 13 and paragraph 14 of Rules No. 1084, paragraph 13 of the Procedure for Accounting for Budgetary Obligations of Recipients funds from the federal budget, approved by Order No. 221n, the EIS implements functionality that allows you to generate the result of control according to an exhaustive list of necessary checks.

The OK LC has a new display of the “Information to be controlled” tab with a step-by-step structure (see Figure 3):

The first step includes checking the availability of documents provided by the customer for inclusion in the Register of Contracts (a copy of the concluded contract, information on the conclusion of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia on the purchase from a single supplier, the decision of the medical commission). Automatically for all documents, the result of the control will be set to "Passed", since the necessary attachment of documents is regulated by format-logical controls when forming information about the contract by the customer. Documents provided by the customer are automatically set as documents containing control information. For further control, it is necessary to download a copy of the concluded contract by clicking on the hyperlink of the relevant document.

The second step includes checking the compliance of the attribute values described in paragraph 13, subparagraph "c" of paragraph 14 of Rules No. 1084, paragraph 13 of Rules No. 1367 and the information specified in the Printed Form included in the Register of Contracts with the terms of the contract contained in the downloaded document on step one. For each of the attributes, you need to set the result, while automatically the field "identified inconsistencies" will be filled in with the appropriate text about the found inconsistencies. When controlling attributes for each object of procurement, for each medicinal product or each supplier, it is necessary to set the result of the control as "Failed" if at least one of them is found to be non-compliant. At the same time, in the identified discrepancies, it is recommended to specify in which particular procurement object, medicinal product, etc. found a mismatch.

The third step includes checking the name of each procurement object for compliance with the catalog of goods, works and services (hereinafter referred to as KTR). The value “Passed” is automatically set for this parameter by the system, since when the customer forms the name of the control object according to the KTR, compliance is automatically ensured. If automatic compliance was not established in the Register of Contracts, then it is necessary to carry out this control manually.

The fourth step includes checking, according to Order No. 221n, for the compliance of the information about the project of the adopted BO with the document with the basis, i.e. printed form of information included in the Register of Contracts. The value “Passed” is automatically set by the system for this parameter, since the correspondence of documents to each other is ensured by format-logical controls during the formation of information by the customer. If at least one of the checks under Order No. 221n reveals a discrepancy, then it is necessary to set the result of this item as “Not Passed”.

The fifth step includes checking the consistency of the information included in the Register of Contracts against the information already included in the Register of Contracts for this contract. This step will display a list of documents within the registry number included in the Register of Contracts, i.e. documents for which a notification of compliance was previously signed. This check must be done manually.

6. Other changes to the control functionality to ensure ease of use

6.1. An indication has been implemented during the control of procurement schedules for the procurement plan (see Figure 4), notifications of procurement and procurement documentation for the procurement schedule, displaying information that the document containing information for monitoring (purchase plan, procurement schedule respectively) was placed with a negative control result.

6.2. A warning has been implemented for the Control Body during control if a new version of the document containing information for control has been posted (see Figure 5), for example, when a new version of the procurement plan is posted during the control of the procurement schedule or a new version of the plan is posted - procurement schedule when monitoring the notification of procurement and procurement documentation. When re-forming the control result, all previously entered data will be lost, a new project of the control result will be generated according to the current version. If the Control Authority ignored the message, then next to the document version, an inscription will be displayed stating that the document is no longer up-to-date (see Figure 6).

Figure 5. Displaying a message about the need to recalculate information to a more up-to-date version of the document containing information for monitoring#

6.3. Implemented functionality for displaying the results of automatic control of the document. If you need to restore the results of automatic control, you must click on the hyperlink "Display results of automatic control", after which the data entered on the page will be lost and the result of automatic control will be displayed. At the same time, the Control Result block will always display which control result was generated automatically if the Control Body decided to make changes (see Figure).

6.4. Implemented functionality for choosing from a directory of typical identified non-conformities. The field "Identified non-compliances" of the tabular section is a text field with the possibility of pre-filling it with one of the typical non-conformities that can be identified for this control object (see Figure 8).

The list of values available for selection is displayed when the cursor is placed in the field of identified inconsistencies. To fill in the field, select the desired value and click on it. After selection, this value is displayed in the field, and subsequently displayed in bold, which indicates that this discrepancy has already been specified. If necessary, you can adjust the field by entering arbitrary text. All inconsistencies entered in the tabular part are automatically displayed in the "Identified inconsistencies" field in the "Control result" block. When generating an automatic control result, the UIS independently prefills the fields with typical inconsistencies from such a directory.

6.5. In the customer's personal account, the functionality of the ability to set the blocking of the placement of control objects is implemented until the result of control is received on them. This setting is available to the Administrator of the organization in the section "Setting the blocking of placement of documents (PP RF 315)" (see Figure 9). It should be noted that, according to Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 315 dated March 20, 2017 “On Amendments to the Rules for Exercising Control Provided for by Part 5 of Article 99 of the Federal Law “On the Contract System in the Procurement of Goods, Works, and Services to Ensure State and Municipal Needs” until January 1, 2019, in relation to customers making purchases to meet the state needs of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (municipal needs), the provisions of paragraph two of clause 14, paragraph two of clause 15 of Rule 1367 were suspended (in terms of non-placement of objects of control in the UIS until the identified violations are eliminated).

6.6. The OK LC has the ability to set auto-signing of control results (notices of compliance / protocol of non-compliance) in the Personal Account of the Control Body, which is a territorial body of the Federal Treasury. This setting is available to the Administrator of the organization in the section "Setting the blocking of placement of documents (PP RF 315)" (see Figure 10). It should be noted that when setting the auto-signing setting, the Control Authority continues to be responsible for the control result issued to the customer in this way, as if it had carried out control and signed the control result on its own, therefore, it is necessary to be careful when using the setting and apply it only for documents in which the automatically generated control result always coincides with the decision made on such a document by the Control Body itself.

Document overview

The release of version 8.1 of the EIS in the field of procurement is reported. Up-to-date methodological recommendations have been prepared on control in the field of procurement, including for the needs of the country's defense and state security.

Implemented a ban on placement by federal customers of the final protocol for determining the supplier (contractor, performer) in the event that a non-compliance protocol is issued on it due to a discrepancy found between the information contained in the OPPI and the procurement documentation data (purchase notification).

In the customer's personal account, the functionality of the ability to set the blocking of the placement of control objects until the result is received on them is implemented.