Hello, dear employee! I am often asked questions about whether it is possible to determine information about participants in an electronic auction before bidding. The “threads” of most public procurement forums are full of these same questions.
The question is truly interesting and relevant. But I can immediately upset you. It is prohibited to determine such data directly by legal means. But there are still a couple of ways through which it is possible to fully legally find out potential auction participants, but we will talk about this a little later.
The very idea of holding electronic auctions is precisely to make this procedure as transparent and non-corrupt as possible. But this is only in theory; in practice, the situation is different. I suggest you set aside a couple of minutes. free time and understand everything in detail...
In accordance with Part 2 of Art. 66 44-FZ application for participation in electronic auction consists of 2 parts. The first part of the application should not contain any information about the participant, i.e. the client should not know from whom this or that application came. Each application has only a serial number assigned by the operator electronic platform.
The client acquires information about auction participants only at the time of receiving the second parts of applications from the operator.
In accordance with the requirements of Part 15 of Art. 66 44-FZ, the operator of an electronic site MUST ensure the confidentiality of information about participants in an electronic auction who have submitted applications for participation in such an auction, and the information contained in the first and second parts of this application before posting the protocol of the auction on the electronic site. For violation of this requirement, the operator of the electronic platform is liable in the legal framework of the Russian Federation.
But, as they say, demand creates supply. The anthropogenic factor has not yet been canceled, so it is not uncommon for operators of electronic platforms to simply “leak” data about participants who submitted bids for an auction for a fee. This information can be communicated both to the client and specifically to one or more participants.
2. How do participants who illegally take data about their own potential rivals act?
The scheme of actions of such participants is quite simple. Having in hand a list of all auction participants, a domestic participant with information, let’s call him Mr. “X,” begins to call all participants alternately. In the conversation, Mr. “X” invites each participant to “keep silent” at the auction, i.e. do not submit price proposals in exchange for remuneration. The size of the remuneration, in most cases, ranges from 0.5% to 1% of the initial (large) contract price (NMCP).
With a small number of participants, such a scheme has the right to fate, but one should not expect a 100% guarantee from it. Some of the participants may refuse this illegal offer, while others, having taken the reward, will still participate in the auction.
In my practice there were a couple of similar cases. Almost within 30-60 minutes. after submitting an application for an electronic auction, a person called me, informing me that we were participating in the same auction and offering a reward so that I would not submit price bids. For my “silence” he offered to transfer 1% of the NMCC to the account I specified.
In such cases, I always responded with a final refusal, which I advise you to do too, because... participation in such activities is an offence.
3. What specific legal methods of identifying potential bidders exist?
We have dealt with the illegal method of obtaining information about auction participants (bribery of the operator of an electronic platform). Now let's talk about cheap, legal methods that will allow you to predict
potential participants in one or another auction.
First method. Determine the number of potential auction participants
When submitting an application for the auction, the participant is assigned a serial number (Part 9, Article 66 44-FZ).
If you are assigned, for example, number 4, then you already realize that besides you there are 3 more potential participants. Many participants try to submit their own application a couple of hours before the application deadline in order to roughly determine the number of potential participants.
What can such information give the participant? In fact, there is only one thing, if there are a large number of participants, then at the auction itself there will be a fierce struggle for the contract and, in most cases, the NMCC will be very much reduced. Based on this, as a rule, participation in such an auction is not advisable. But there is one thing that must always be taken into account - there are exceptions to any rule.
It is not a fact that all participants who submitted applications will be allowed to participate in the auction itself. It is not a fact that all participants will dump. Finally, there is always the possibility that some bidders may be rejected by the client upon completion of the review of the second parts of applications. Based on this, we fully hope for this method I don't advise you.
There are methods that are much more effective, and we will talk about them below.
Second method. Manual analysis of similar customer purchases for a certain period
This method makes it possible, with a certain degree of possibility, to predict which specific suppliers will participate in a particular auction. To do this, you need to go to the website - www.zakupki.gov.ru. And perform an analysis of completed auctions using the advanced search tool.
In the form that opens, you need to fill in the fields in accordance with the search parameters. In most cases, this is:
- Federal Law number - 44-FZ;
- procurement method - electronic auction;
- Date of publication of the order - the required time period is indicated;
- Federal District of the Client - indicate required;
- Subject of the Russian Federation of the Client - required is indicated;
- Procurement stage - procurement is completed;
- District/city - indicated if necessary;
- Electronic platform address - indicated if necessary;
- OKPD codes - the necessary ones are indicated.
Then the analysis of completed electronic auctions, in particular the summing up protocols, is carried out.
In addition, you also need to perform an analysis of contract arrests for a separately selected client. Knowing the name of his Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) and the customer, it is possible to find information about the contracts he has condemned with the winners of past purchases, similar to the one in which you plan to participate. This information is located on the website www.zakupki.gov.ru in “ Unified register national and municipal contracts.”
This method is quite time-consuming and labor-intensive, but in the absence of paid analytical tools in the participant’s arsenal, it is the only probable one.
Third method. Software analysis of similar customer purchases for a certain period
The method outlined above for detecting potential auction participants can be significantly accelerated and simplified if you use analytical tools such as this moment are available in most paid tender search programs. For example, such as ist-budget, bicotender, seldon. The undisputed favorite among such programs is Seldon.
In my opinion, this is the most wonderful program, both for searching for tenders and for analyzing them, which allows you to do all the necessary analytical reports in a matter of seconds. You can see this for yourself by testing this program in test access. You can sign up for a test drive of the Seldon program here.
Below I have attached a short video about how analytical reports are generated in this population.
Under electronic auction period according to 44-FZ, they mean the period of time allotted for each stage of the procurement. Let's take a closer look at how many stages there are and within what timeframes, according to the law, they must take place.
Auction dates for Federal Law 44 in the table
If NMCC less than and equal to 300 million rubles(and in the case of construction, reconstruction, and major repairs of objects capital construction less than or equal to 2 billion rubles), then the minimum procurement time and conclusion of the contract 19 days.
If NMCC more than 300 million rubles(and in the case of construction, reconstruction, overhaul of capital construction projects more than 2 billion rubles), then the minimum time for procurement and conclusion of the contract 26 days.
Deadlines for filing applications for an electronic auction under 44-FZ
1. The very first step in organizing an electronic auction is posting a notice of its holding and tender documentation. The deadline for submitting applications for the electronic auction varies depending on the amount of the NMCC: if it exceeds 300 million rubles. (and in the case of construction, reconstruction, and major repairs of capital construction projects exceeds 2 billion rubles), then the notice must be posted in 15 days(or more) until the closing date for applications. If the initial price is 300 million rubles. and less (or less than 2 billion rubles in the case of construction work) - then in 7 days(or more).
2. There are times when it is necessary to make changes to the notice or documentation itself. For this purpose, electronic auctions under 44-FZ provide for the following deadlines: no later than 2 days before the deadline for accepting applications.
And if changes are made, then the time for filing should be increased in accordance with paragraph 1 of our article, i.e. up to 15 days and up to 7 days, respectively.
3. If the customer decides to refuse the auction, he can do so no later than 5 days before the end of applications.
4. The participant can submit a request for clarification auction documentation, But no later than 3 days before the end of applications. The customer must publish the response within 2 days from the receipt of this request.
5. A participant in an electronic auction can change or withdraw his application at any time before the deadline for acceptance. If he does not have time to do this within the established period, his first part of the application will be considered and, if it is consistent, the participant will be admitted to the auction, but he has the right not to submit price proposals.
6. The next stage is the consideration of the first parts of applications submitted by participants. It amounts to 1 working day after the deadline for submission, if the contract price is less than or equal to RUB 300,000,000. (in the case of construction work, 2 billion rubles or less).
In all other cases, the period for consideration of the first parts of applications is 3 working days. During this period, applications that do not meet the requirements for the composition of the first part of the application specified in the documentation are eliminated.
At the same time, a protocol for considering the first parts of the application is sent to the operator of the electronic trading platform, where procurement takes place, and the data is placed in the Unified Information System.
However, if the documentation includes design documentation, then the deadline for submitting applications is also the deadline for reviewing the first parts of applications. In other words, if a participant submits an application to participate in such an auction, it is automatically considered accepted.
7. Then the deadline for the auction under 44-FZ comes, this is the working day following the end date for consideration of the first parts.
For example, if applications were reviewed on Friday, then the electronic auction will be on Monday, because after Friday the next working day is Monday.
If project documentation is included as part of the documentation, the auction takes place 4 hours after the end of applications.
8. After this, it is necessary to announce the protocol of the auction. This information is posted on the electronic procurement platform within 30 minutes after the completion of the last phase of bidding, and the protocol is sent to the customer within 1 hour, together with the second parts of the applications, after publication on the ETP.
9. Review of 2 parts of the application must take place on time no more than 3 working days , from the moment the protocol on the electronic auction is posted on the site. The final protocol, drawn up after consideration of the second parts of the applications, will determine the winner of the purchase.
10. Within 5 calendar days , from the date of publication of the final protocol in which the winner is determined, the customer in personal account the winner sends him a draft contract.
Deadlines for signing a contract under 44-FZ in an electronic auction
11. Within 5 calendar days After receiving the draft contract from the customer, the winner must sign the contract on his part, attaching a document confirming the execution of the contract, or send the customer a protocol of disagreements.
12. If a protocol of disagreements has been sent, then the customer is given 3 days to study it and publish a modified version of the contract. If the contract is posted without changes, then the customer must justify the refusal of the participant’s proposed changes.
13. Over the next 3 working days after publication of the revised (or the same) version of the contract, the winner is obliged to sign the contract on his part, attaching a document confirming the execution of the contract.
14. The customer must sign the contract within 3 working days after the winner does so. From this moment the contract is considered concluded.
Please note that the contract cannot be concluded earlier than 10 days from the date the winner is determined, those. placement of the final protocol.
15. If the participant’s application was rejected in the first / second part or during the auction, violations were identified on the part of the customer or the operator of the electronic platform, the participant has 5 days from the date of the final protocol(i.e. from the moment the winner is determined) to send a complaint to the FAS.
You can learn about all the timing of the electronic auction and its features in our training course “Government Order”. RusTender employees have specially collected all the necessary information, supported by their own experience of participation, thanks to which you will be able to successfully participate in government procurement and receive contracts.
These are the main stages and terms of the auction under 44-FZ, taking place in electronic form on the ETP of federal operators. All time characteristics given in the text are current at the time of writing. To always keep abreast of the latest changes, follow the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation.
These are the main stages and terms of the electronic auction under 44-FZ, reflected in a tabular schematic form. All time characteristics given in the text are current at the time of writing. To always keep abreast of the latest changes, follow the articles on our website and subscribe to our news!
LLC MKK "RusTender"
The material is the property of the site. Any use of the article without indicating the source - the site is prohibited in accordance with Article 1259 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
The anonymity of participants in electronic auctions is imaginary; there is a technological opportunity to reveal the author of the application, industry experts say and electronic auction operators confirm. The anonymity of bidding was one of the key reasons for the start of the experiment to transfer government orders to new format. Within three months, the sites selected for the federal order will have to eliminate the “holes.”
Open electronic auctions for participation in government contracts allow technical opportunities for manipulation of bidding, according to industry experts and representatives of electronic trading platforms themselves. Within three months, the Ministry of Economic Development intends to eliminate gaps in the technical support of electronic auctions.
Operators of electronic trading claim that you can “hack” the anonymity of participants by simply looking at the properties of the submitted documents in the first parts of the applications. “Formally, the auction organizer does not have the opportunity to find out who is taking part in the electronic auction until the second parts of the applications are opened. However, information about the participants who submitted the first parts of applications may become available to the auction organizer, for example, from viewing the properties of documents submitted as part of the first parts of applications, which often indicate information about the organization - the owner of the software product with which the document was created." , says the certificate provided by the inter-industry trading system Fabrikant.ru.
“At different stages of applications, auction organizers have the opportunity to find out information about participants through product documentation,” says Dmitry Mishutin, general director of Fabrikanta.ru.
“In any case, the customer cannot access information about the participant who sent the application if this information was not disclosed by the participant himself in the text. The operator is currently within the framework of the law and operating regulations and is strictly controlled by the FAS in terms of maintaining the confidentiality of such information. “at the moment of passing the technological audit, confidentiality will be ensured at the hardware level thanks to the technology of encrypting all information entering the site,” argues the deputy general director Unified electronic trading platform Moscow (EETP) Andrey Chernogorov.
If desired, participants and organizers of the auction can recognize other participants in the auction, the specialist notes consulting group“Valuable advice” Pavel Safronov. “If a platform reveals the anonymity of participants, the law provides for a fine in the region of several thousand rubles,” says Pavel Safronov.
The anonymity of electronic trading was one of the key advantages of moving government procurement auctions to the Internet. It was assumed that it would provide equal conditions for all participants and eliminate the possibility of unfair competition through collusion.
New technical regulations
On January 25, the government selected five electronic platforms to conduct tenders for federal needs. Of the 18 applicants, the list included the EETP previously operating in experimental mode, the platform of Sberbank and Tatarstan, and two new ones - the RTS and MICEX platforms. Later, the list will also include the site of the St. Petersburg International Commodity and Raw Materials Exchange for government procurement of petroleum products.
Within three months, selected trading platforms will have to eliminate the technical possibility of obtaining information that reveals the anonymity of participants. "Ministry economic development and the Federal Antimonopoly Service have developed regulations and technical requirements to national operators. There is a whole section " Information Security" It states that all information entering the site is encrypted at the hardware level. The server with the information is sealed by representatives of regulatory authorities, the site can operate it, but cannot look inside,” Andrei Chernogorov reported to the site.
Venues will be required to undergo mandatory technology audit, which will be carried out by a contractor selected on a competitive basis by the FAS and the Ministry of Economic Development. “Most likely, it will be one of the large Russian or Western auditors. Maybe it will be the FSB,” predicts Andrei Chernogorov.
Industry experts fear that due to the fact that the transition to electronic trading until recently took place in the form of an experiment, operators may simply not have enough server capacity to provide the required trading volume.
According to the conditions of the Federal Antimonopoly Service and the Ministry of Economic Development, the operator of electronic tenders for government procurement must be able to provide the technical ability to conduct thousands of tenders simultaneously, said Andrei Chernogorov. “The safety margin is many times greater than is currently necessary. Each operator individually can handle 100% of the state order,” says Andrei Chernogorov.
Another problem is that participating in electronic trading only possible using the Internet Explorer Internet browser. “On other browsers, trading results are displayed crookedly. Internet Explorer has the most viruses written under it; it is easier for hackers to bypass it,” says Pavel Safronov.
Other browsers cannot be used for electronic trading due to the fact that they cannot be combined with algorithms certified in Russia for working with electronic digital signature(EDS), explained Andrey Chernogorov. “According to statistics, Internet Explorer is used by more than 60% of Internet users. Since it is the most common, it is logical that it was taken, since the main goal is the availability of government orders,” comments Andrei Chernogorov.
There are also difficulties in using digital signature required for bidding. “Currently there is no provision for judicial practice when using digital signatures. The participant may refuse to sign the documents if they have an electronic signature. Judicial practice, if any violations occur, no,” states Pavel Safronov.
There will be no anonymity
Industry experts remain skeptical about maintaining anonymity in electronic auctions. “Despite the name, decisions on concluding contracts in electronic auctions are made not by computer systems, but by people. And while this is so, the factor of personal interest cannot be ruled out. And there are many possibilities: technical protection can be broken, data about participants, despite the established ban, is transferred to the customer, an order can be placed “retroactively”, unwanted participants can be blocked during the auction,” the head of the legal department of the Nalogovik company is convinced. Alexey Lvov.
The presence of technical problems and lack of elaboration is a consequence of the hasty decision to transfer government orders to the format of electronic auctions, says Alexey Shestoperov, a specialist at the National Institute for Systematic Research of Entrepreneurship Problems (NISIPP). “It is clear that an official, in the absence of any independent control, will always have the opportunity to somehow adjust the system in order to find out in advance the conditions of competitions or the names of companies that will participate. In electronic technologies it is quite difficult to control everything; in any case, there will be room for action at the discretion of the official,” Alexey Shestoperov is sure.
Hello, dear colleague! I am often asked whether it is possible to find out information about participants in an electronic auction before the auction. The “threads” of most public procurement forums are full of these same questions. The question is really interesting and relevant. But I can immediately upset you. It is impossible to find out such information in a legal way. However, there are still several ways in which you can legally identify potential auction participants, but we will talk about this a little later. The very idea of holding electronic auctions is precisely to make this procedure as transparent and non-corrupt as possible. However, this is only in theory; in practice, the situation is different. I suggest you take a few minutes of free time and understand everything in detail... ( Note: This article was updated on February 21, 2019).
1. Application for participation in the electronic auction
According to Part 2 of Art. 66 44-FZ, the application for participation in the electronic auction consists of 2 parts. The first part of the application should not contain absolutely no information about the participant, that is, the Customer should not know from whom this or that application was received. Each application has only a number assigned by the operator of the electronic platform. The customer receives information about auction participants only at the time of receiving the second parts of applications from the operator.
According to the requirements of Part 15 of Art. 66 44-FZ, the operator of an electronic site MUST ensure the confidentiality of information about participants in an electronic auction who submitted applications for participation in such an auction, and the information contained in the first and second parts of this application before posting the protocol of such an auction on the electronic site. For violation of this requirement, the operator of the electronic platform is liable in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation.
2. How do participants who have illegally obtained information about their potential competitors act?
The action plan of such participants is quite simple. Having a list of all auction participants in hand, our participant who has the information, let’s call him Mr. “X,” begins calling all the participants one by one. In the conversation, Mr. “X” invites each participant to “keep silent” at the auction, that is, not to submit price offers in exchange for a reward. The amount of such remuneration, as a rule, ranges from 0.5% to 1% of the initial (maximum) contract price (ICP). With a small number of participants, such a scheme has the right to life, but you should not expect a 100% guarantee from it. Some of the participants may refuse this illegal offer, while others, having received a reward, will still take part in the auction.
There have been several similar cases in my practice. Literally within 30-60 minutes after submitting an application for an electronic auction, I received a call from a person who informed me that we were participating in the same auction and offered a reward so that I would not submit price bids. For my “silence” he offered to transfer 1% of the NMCC to the account I specified. In such cases, I always responded with a categorical refusal, which I recommend you do too, because... participation in such activities is a crime.
3. What legal methods exist for identifying potential bidders?
We have dealt with an illegal method of obtaining information about auction participants (bribery of the operator of an electronic platform). Now let's talk about the available legal methods that will allow you to predict potential participants in a particular auction.
First way. Find out the number of potential auction participants
Until July 1, 2018, when submitting an application for the auction, it was assigned a serial number. If a participant’s application was assigned, for example, number 4, then he understood that in addition to him there were 3 more potential candidates for this contract. Therefore, many participants tried to submit their application a few hours before the application deadline in order to roughly determine the number of potential participants.
What did this information give the participant? In fact, there is only one thing: if there are many participants, then there will certainly be a fierce struggle for the contract at the auction itself and, as a rule, the NMCC will be greatly reduced. Therefore, in most cases, participation in such an auction is not advisable. But there is one thing that must always be taken into account - there are exceptions to any rule. It is not a fact that all participants who submitted applications will be allowed to participate in the auction itself. It is not a fact that all participants will dump. And finally, there is always a possibility that some participants may be rejected by the Customer based on the results of consideration of the second parts of applications.
However, since July 1, 2018, the situation has changed radically. Now, participants’ applications are assigned not serial numbers, but identification numbers (Part 9, Article 66 of 44-FZ). For example, you submitted an application and it was assigned number 5367, the second application was assigned number 15, and the third - 647. Thus, it is not possible to determine how many applications were submitted for the auction. Therefore, at present this method has lost its relevance. However, there are much more effective ways, and we will talk about them below.
Second way. Manual analysis of similar purchases of the Customer for a certain period
This method allows you to predict with a certain degree of probability which suppliers will take part in a particular auction. To do this you need to go to the website - www.zakupki.gov.ru. And perform an analysis of completed auctions using the advanced search tool.
In the form that opens, you must fill in the fields in accordance with the search criteria. Typically this is:
- Federal Law number - 44-FZ;
- method for determining the supplier - electronic auction;
- Date the information was posted—specify the required time interval;
- Federal District of the Customer - indicate the desired one;
- Subject of the Russian Federation of the Customer - the required one is indicated;
- Procurement stage - the procedure is completed;
- District/city - indicated if necessary;
- Electronic platform address - indicated if necessary;
- OKPD2 codes - the required ones are indicated.
After this, an analysis of completed electronic auctions is carried out, in particular the summing up protocols.
In addition, it is also necessary to perform an analysis of concluded contracts for an individual Customer. Knowing the name of the Customer and his TIN, you can find information about the contracts he has concluded with the winners of past purchases similar to the one in which you plan to take part. This information is on the website www.zakupki.gov.ru in the section “Register of contracts 44-FZ”. This section is located at home page website in the “Contracts and Agreements” tab.
This method is quite long and labor-intensive, but in the absence of paid analytical tools in the participant’s arsenal, it is the only possible one.
Third way. Program analysis of similar purchases of the Customer for a certain period
The method described above for identifying potential auction participants can be significantly accelerated and simplified if you use analytical tools that are currently available in most paid tender search programs. For example, such as tender plan, ist-budget, bicotender, seldon. In addition, some aggregators in the field of government procurement will provide you with the opportunity to independently analyze possible participants. This service is very convenient and extremely functional, and, most importantly, it is significantly lower in cost than many search programs. The approach is this: you will be given access to the most complete database of government tender participants with a history of 8 years, in which you, using the settings, set the search criteria of interest by field of activity, region and contract value - then the built-in CRM system will do everything for you. You get results without significant investments and resources. Today, perhaps, the best such aggregator service is CRMBG.SU.
1. Only those registered in a single information system, accredited on the electronic platform and its participants allowed to participate in such an auction.
2. An electronic auction is held on an electronic platform on the day specified in the notice of its holding and determined taking into account part 3 of this article. The start time of such an auction is set by the operator of the electronic platform in accordance with the time of the time zone in which the customer is located.
3. The day of an electronic auction is the business day following the expiration date for consideration of the first parts of applications for participation in such an auction. In this case, an electronic auction, if included in the procurement documentation in accordance with clause 8 of part 1 of Article 33 of this Federal Law project documentation is held four hours after the deadline for submitting applications for participation in the specified electronic auction.
(see text in the previous edition)
4. An electronic auction is conducted by reducing the initial (maximum) contract price specified in the notice of such an auction, in the manner established by this article.
5. If, in accordance with this Federal Law, the quantity of goods supplied, the volume of work to be performed, or services to be provided cannot be determined, an electronic auction is held by reducing the initial amount of prices for units of goods, work, or services in the manner established by this article.
(see text in the previous edition)
6. The amount of reduction in the initial (maximum) contract price (hereinafter referred to as the “auction step”) ranges from 0.5 percent to 5 percent of the initial (maximum) contract price.
(see text in the previous edition)
7. When conducting an electronic auction, its participants submit proposals for the contract price, providing for a reduction in the current minimum proposal for the contract price by an amount within the “auction step”.
8. When conducting an electronic auction, any participant also has the right to submit a proposal for the contract price regardless of the “auction step”, subject to compliance with the requirements provided for in Part 9 of this article.
9. When conducting an electronic auction, its participants submit proposals for the contract price, taking into account the following requirements:
1) a participant in such an auction does not have the right to submit a contract price proposal that is equal to or greater than the contract price proposal previously submitted by this participant, as well as a contract price proposal equal to zero;
2) a participant in such an auction does not have the right to submit a contract price proposal that is lower than the current minimum contract price proposal, reduced within the “auction step”;
3) a participant in such an auction does not have the right to submit a proposal for a contract price that is lower than the current minimum proposal for a contract price if it is submitted by such a participant in an electronic auction.
10. From the start of the electronic auction on the electronic platform until the expiration of the deadline for submitting proposals for the contract price, all proposals for the contract price and the time of their receipt, as well as the time remaining before the expiration of the deadline for submitting proposals for the contract price, must be indicated in accordance with part 11 of this article.
11. When conducting an electronic auction, the time for accepting proposals from participants in such an auction for the contract price is set at ten minutes from the start of such an auction until the expiration of the deadline for submitting proposals for the contract price, as well as ten minutes after the receipt of the last proposal for the contract price. The time remaining until the deadline for submitting contract price proposals is updated automatically using software and technical means, ensuring the holding of such an auction after the initial (maximum) contract price has been reduced or the last offer on the contract price has been received. If during the specified time no proposal for a lower contract price is received, such an auction ends automatically, with the help of software and hardware that ensures its conduct.
12. Within ten minutes from the moment of completion of the electronic auction in accordance with Part 11 of this article, any participant has the right to submit a proposal for the contract price, which is not lower than the last proposal for the minimum contract price, regardless of the “auction step”, taking into account the requirements provided for paragraphs 1 and 3 of part 9 of this article.
13. The operator of an electronic site is obliged to ensure the confidentiality of information about its participants when conducting an electronic auction.
14. During an electronic auction, the operator of the electronic site is obliged to reject proposals for the contract price that do not meet the requirements provided for in this article.
15. Rejection by the operator of the electronic platform of proposals for the contract price on grounds not provided for in Part 14 of this article is not permitted.
16. If a participant in an electronic auction offers a contract price equal to the price offered by another participant in such an auction, the proposal for the contract price received earlier is recognized as the best.
17. In the event of an electronic auction being held in accordance with Part 5 of this article, its participant who offered the most low price contract, the person who offered the lowest price for units of goods, work, or services is recognized.
(see text in the previous edition)
18. The protocol of the electronic auction is posted on the electronic platform by its operator within thirty minutes after the end of such an auction. This protocol indicates the address of the electronic platform, the date, time of the beginning and end of such an auction, the initial (maximum) contract price, all minimum proposals for the contract price made by participants in such an auction and ranked in descending order, indicating the identification numbers assigned to applications for participation in such auction, which are submitted by its participants who have made appropriate proposals for the contract price, and indicating the time of receipt of these proposals.
(see text in the previous edition)
19. Within one hour after posting the protocol specified in Part 18 of this article on the electronic platform, the operator of the electronic platform is obliged to send to the customer the specified protocol and the second parts of applications for participation in such an auction submitted by its participants, proposals for the contract price of which, when ranked in in accordance with Part 18 of this article, the first ten serial numbers were received, or if less than ten participants took part in such an auction, the second parts of applications for participation in such an auction submitted by its participants, as well as information and electronic documents these participants, provided for in Part 11 of Article 24.1 of this Federal Law. At the same time, when conducting an electronic auction, if project documentation is included in the procurement documentation in accordance with paragraph 8 of Part 1 of Article 33 of this Federal Law, the operator of the electronic site also sends to the customer the first parts of the applications of such participants as provided for in Part 3.1 of Article 66 of this Federal Law. Within the specified period, the operator of the electronic platform is obliged to send relevant notifications to participants.
(see text in the previous edition)
Loading...